- The Chairman of CFTC and SEC, along with FinCEN director issue a joint statement to firms engaging in digital assets to follow their guidelines.
- Emphasis was laid on obligations under the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA), anti-money laundering and countering terrorist funding through cryptocurrencies.
Digital assets firm has often avoided following specific rules riding on the ambiguity of the nature of the assets. The most common among them are bypassing registration as securities.
Nevertheless, the joint statement aims to keep no stone unturned. It explicitly defines the various financial instruments like derivatives, Money Services Businesses (MSB), mutual funds, etc., while directing the firms engaging with them to procure compliance soon.
The joint statement issued by the agencies states that the “financial institutions” must register with the specific agency. It is being done to counter the money laundering and terrorist funding via cryptocurrencies.
The firms must adhere to the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) which promotes collaboration with the U.S. government in cases of suspected money laundering and fraud. The press release noted,
the AML/CFT activities of a futures commission merchant will be overseen by the CFTC, FinCEN, and the National Futures Association (NFA);
those of an MSB will be overseen by FinCEN;
those of a broker-dealer in securities will be overseen by the SEC, FinCEN and a self-regulatory organization, primarily the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA)
Hence, the firms must clearly define their products and seek permission from these regulators. Therefore, a firm or asset sold by a firm meets the definition of “securities” under federal law must comply with federal securities law.
The firms engaging in finance are also “required to report suspicious activity and implement reasonably-designed AML Programs.”
The use of cryptocurrencies in illicit activities and cyber theft is not a surprising occurrence. Hence, the warnings issued by the Government agencies must be adhered to strictly by the firms to avoid security and economic threats to nations. The three regulators have also been considerably inclusive of activities around digital assets. However, their emphasis on the need for compliance was considerable.
What do you think about the warnings, and how will it affect the crypto markets? Please share your views with us.
- Luxury Car brand Lamborghini joins the NFT Bandwagon
- Mercedes Taps NFT Creators In Celebration of G-Class Series
- Why Ethereum (ETH) Price May Explode Coming July?
- Elon Musk Shamed After DogeBonk Took The ‘Moon Mission’ Challenge To The SpaceX Factory
- Cardano (ADA) Price Rises By 30% Last Week, Transactions Volume in last 24 hrs Surpasses $5 Billion
- Cardano (ADA) Dodges Broader Market Correction With Another 8% Gains
- MultiChain users at risk of Getting Hacked, as Six Cross-Chain Tokens Experiences Vulnerability
- ‘Ripple is giving SEC more Trouble than Anyone in Crypto’ Attorney Chervinsky
- OpenSea Sets New ATH For Monthly Trading Volume, Surpasses $3.5B in ETH
- Malaysian Converts Selfies Into NFTs, Becomes Millionaire In Just 5 Days
- Solana Creeps Higher, Looks To Revisit January Highs AT $177.0
- Ethereum Price Analysis: Fibonacci Retracement level 0.618 Triggers Recovery Rally In ETH Coin
- BTC Price Analysis: Death Crossover Brings Nightmares On Satoshi Street; Is This A Buying Opportunity?
- Bitcoin Death Cross Haunting Investors, Will BTC Make or Break?
- DOGE Price Analysis: Highly Influential Bearish Trendline Undermines Bullish Attempts; Buy, Sell Or Hold?
- Terra Price Analysis: Will LUNA Price Bounce Back at 0.382 Fibonacci Retracement?
- SAND Price Analysis: Sandbox Price Losses 50% Retracement Level, Good Time to Buy?
- LINK Price Analysis: Chainlink price reclaims 200-day EMA, Emerging trendline Suggests More Upward Price Movement
- Harmony Price Analysis: Rising Parallel Pattern Could Lead 30% Growth In $ONE Price
- Ripple Price Analysis: XRP Bears Struggle To Breach $0.7 Support Zone, Is A Reversal Next Move?