Ethereum Runs into a Difficulty Spike, Bitcoin Dev Smells Disaster in January Hark Fork

Ethereum-ETH Trading volumes

Ethereum Runs into a Difficulty Spike, Bitcoin Dev Smells Disaster in January Hark Fork

  • Ethereum will go under another hard fork – Muir Glacier on 4th January 2020.
  • On 14th December, Ethereum’s difficulty rate spiked due to the Ice Age Difficulty bomb.
  • Udi Wertheimer cites that this will cause an increase in inflation and other technical troubles due to the hard fork.

Ethereum recently went through the Istanbul hard fork on 8th December 2019. It was one of the first in a series of hard forks to shift to PoS.

However, in a surprising turn of events, the developers at the Ethereum Foundation has come to a realization that they forgot to upgrade something!

As reported earlier on CoinGape, Tuur Demeester, a crypto analyst and founder of Adamant Capital cited that Ethereum’s Ice Age is a to worrying for the ecosystem. The proposal for Muir Glacier was drafted by dev,

Furthermore, Peter Todd cited the difficulties of scheduling multiple hard forks in a short period.

While the network still hasn’t recouped from the troubles in the previous hard fork, they are preparing for a new one. Udi Wertheimer, a blockchain programmer and Bitcoin maximalist, cites how Ethereum devs are backed up against the wall. He tweeted,

The next hard fork? It’s in TWO WEEKS. Why? Because otherwise the Ethereum blockchain would slow to a crawl.

Did Ethereum Devs Forget about the Ice Age Bomb?

Wertheimer also cites that this update includes only one improvement, i.e. to get rid of the ice age difficulty. Therefore, looks like the leading Ethereum devs and nodes committed a blunder by ignoring the issue. He notes,

they forgot to actually push the Ice Age forward as they usually do. Yep, forgot. They thought it isn’t time yet.

The said mechanism increases the inherent difficulty for the miners. However, the mining rewards reduced this year and the increase in difficulty further would slow down the network and hurt mining nodes.

The delay in the update to Ethereum 2.0 is one of the leading reasons which has driven the network to a difficult threshold.

ethereum difficulty spikes
Ethereum Difficulty Chart (Source)

On 14th December, the difficulty of Ethereum mining saw a spike while the hash rate remained constant. Hence, the time is running out for the network to sustain its ability to run.

How will it affect Production?

Ethereum’s daily rate of block rewards or infusion of new coins was above 15,000 ETH/per at the beginning of the year. However, the last couple of weeks has been a decline in this rate possibly due to the uncertainty around the changes and rising difficulty.

The inflation of new ETH is around 10,000 since December 14, 2019. According to Wertheimer, this will change early in January after the update. He cites that this will increase inflation,

Essentially inflation became lower for a while, and it will be spiked back up in two weeks. This kind of CRITICAL change is being done with no oversight or backlash, almost as an afterthought.

Hence, if the rate of supply increases, the sell-off by miners would increase as well. This could cause a dent in the price.

Moreover, the two consecutive hard forks require the operating nodes to update to the new versions. For a large network like Ethereum’s, this can cause a lot of chaos deterring node operators away from Ethereum.

Furthermore, it also raises concerns around the decentralization of the cryptocurrency. As Subsequent hard forks are not practical for a decentralized network.

Do you think that the new projects will be able to sustain the price or on-chain effects would cause a dump? Please share your views with. 

Summary
Ethereum Runs into a Difficulty Spike, Bitcoin Dev Smells Disaster in January Hark Fork
Article Name
Ethereum Runs into a Difficulty Spike, Bitcoin Dev Smells Disaster in January Hark Fork
Description
Ethereum recently went through the Istanbul hard fork on 8th December 2019. It was one of the first in a series of hard forks to shift to PoS. 
Author
Publisher Name
CoinGape
Publisher Logo
Coingape is committed to following the highest standards of journalism, and therefore, it abides by a strict editorial policy. While CoinGape takes all the measures to ensure that the facts presented in its news articles are accurate.
Disclaimer The views, opinions, positions or strategies expressed by the authors and those providing comments are theirs alone, and do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, positions or strategies of CoinGape. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.
Author: Nivesh Rustgi
Nivesh from Engineering Background is a full-time Crypto Analyst at Coingape. He is an atheist who believes in love and cultural diversity. He believes that Cryptocurrency is a necessity to deter corruption. He holds small amounts of cryptocurrencies. Faith and fear are two sides of the same coin. Follow him on Twitter at @nivishoes or mail him at nivesh(at)coingape.com
Post your comment...
Nivesh Rustgi 1147 Articles
Nivesh from Engineering Background is a full-time Crypto Analyst at Coingape. He is an atheist who believes in love and cultural diversity. He believes that Cryptocurrency is a necessity to deter corruption. He holds small amounts of cryptocurrencies. Faith and fear are two sides of the same coin. Follow him on Twitter at @nivishoes or mail him at nivesh(at)coingape.com
Follow Nivesh @