US SEC Highlights Nov 9 as Key Date in Ripple Lawsuit

Despite the dismissal of charges against Ripple's top executives, the US SEC is still likely to pursue a settlement on institutional ruling in the XRP Lawsuit.
By Godfrey Benjamin
Ripple SEC Case XRP lawsuit conclusion US SEC appeal

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has scheduled a critical meeting and confer session on November 9 in the ongoing XRP Vs SEC lawsuit as seen in a letter sent to Judge Analisa Torres.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Ripple vs SEC: the November 9 Date

The importance of the November 9 meeting lies in its role in determining the next steps in this legal battle. 

During this meeting and confer session, the SEC and Ripple Labs are poised to discuss the potential briefing schedule regarding the pending issue in the case. Specifically, the focus will be on what remedies are appropriate to address Ripple’s alleged Section 5 violations related to its institutional sales of XRP. 

Section 5 of the Securities Act of 1933 requires that securities be registered with the SEC before it can be sold to the public, including, institutional investors. The question is whether XRP constitutes a security under this law and, if so, whether Ripple violated this regulation. 

The outcome of this lawsuit could set a significant precedent for the treatment of digital assets within the United States.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Potential Remedies and Outlook for Ripple

The resolution being pursued by the SEC could potentially entail a substantial settlement. Such a settlement might involve Ripple paying a significant sum, which could run into the millions of dollars which may strain Ripple in addition to the legal bills it has incurred during the years-long legal battle. 

While Ripple’s executives have indicated to the community that the recent developments do not necessarily imply an impending settlement, it remains an option that cannot be ruled out. Despite the ongoing legal battle and the SEC’s assertion of violations, Ripple has held on to two significant victories since the July 13 ruling.

Firstly, Judge Torres ruled that programmatic sales of XRP on secondary trading platforms do not constitute securities. This ruling has had a positive impact on XRP’s status as an asset, making it more appealing to the community, exchanges, and service providers in the crypto industry.

Secondly,  the dismissal of charges against Brad Garlinghouse and Chris Larsen provides some relief for Ripple, as its leadership is no longer directly entangled in the legal proceedings.

Advertisement
Godfrey Benjamin
Benjamin Godfrey is a blockchain enthusiast and journalists who relish writing about the real life applications of blockchain technology and innovations to drive general acceptance and worldwide integration of the emerging technology. His desires to educate people about cryptocurrencies inspires his contributions to renowned blockchain based media and sites. Benjamin Godfrey is a lover of sports and agriculture. Follow him on X, Linkedin
Why trust CoinGape: CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights to our readers. Our journalists and analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.
Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.