Just In: FinCEN “Technically” Prohibits Public Comments on Newly Proposed Crypto Wallet Regulations

Published by

The much-awaited regulations around crypto wallets  that would extend AML regulations to non-custodial wallets were finally released by the Financial Crimes Enforcement Agency (FinCEN)  called  “Requirements for Certain Transactions Involving Convertible Virtual Currency or Digital Assets.”

The new set of rules would require any virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs) such as exchanges and custodians to record the name and address of the owners of the wallet for any transactions above $3,000 and a full-fledged currency transaction report in cases whetre the tranaction amount exceeds $10,000.

The newly proposed regulations were not received with open arms by the crypto community but many believed the proposed regulations by FinCen could have been worst. Jake Chervinsky, a lawyer by profession took to Twitter to explain the proposals of the bill and deemed it “awful.” However, he believed that this is just the beginning and regulations would come around as the adoption grows.

US Treasury Offers 15-Day Public Comment Time Frame, But Technically Blocks Them From Making Any!

The newly proposed FinCen rules have a very short 15-day time frame allocated for public comment to administrative rules, however, there’s a “technical” catch or loophole that would devoid the public from making any comments at all. The policy read

“…because this proposal involves a foreign affairs function of the United States and because ‘notice and public procedure thereon are impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest.”

When enquired about the reasons behind such a short time-frame and the technical blocking the public from any comments, the regulatory body cited ‘significant national security imperatives’. FinCEN elaborated that they have already taken necessary feedback from the stakeholders of the blockchain community justifying their reason behind such an accelerated time frame.

A series of government policies and regulations towards crypto proposed in the past quarter seems more regressive be it the new STABLE Act bill, or the new FATF travel guidelines, the government seems to be quite determined to ensure that the rise of cryptocurrencies does not interfere with their sovereignty to issue money.

Share
Prashant Jha

An engineering graduate, Prashant focuses on UK and Indian markets. As a crypto-journalist, his interests lie in blockchain technology adoption across emerging economies.

Published by

Recent Posts

  • Crypto News

Can Bitcoin Price Hit $250,000 by 2026 End? Here’s What Peter Brandt Predicts

The latest Bitcoin price recovery has sparked anticipation of $250,000 among some in the crypto…

April 28, 2026
  • Bitcoin News

U.S. Rep to Reintroduce Strategic Bitcoin Reserve Bill, Renamed ‘American Reserves Modernization Act’

U.S. Representative Nick Begich has revealed plans to reintroduce his Strategic Bitcoin Reserve bill under…

April 27, 2026
  • Crypto News

CLARITY Act Faces Hurdle as Senate Democrats Demand Ethics Provision

The CLARITY Act is facing a new hurdle amid a delay in the markup of…

April 27, 2026
  • Crypto News

Ethereum Foundation Sells $34M ETH to Bitmine, More Selloff Incoming?

The Ethereum Foundation has been on the investors' radar lately due to its continuing ETH…

April 27, 2026
  • Bitcoin News

Just-In: Vivek Ramaswamy’s Strive Boosts Bitcoin Holdings With $61M BTC Purchase

Bitcoin treasury company Strive Asset Management (NYSE:ASST) has continued to buy BTC. Vivek Ramaswamy's Strive…

April 27, 2026
  • Stablecoin News

Solana In Spotlight As Western Union Eyes Stablecoin Launch

Western Union is pushing further into blockchain payments, announcing it will launch a new stablecoin,…

April 27, 2026