Beba and DeFi Education Fund File Lawsuit Against SEC

Beba and the DeFi Education Fund sue SEC over $BEBA token's security status, challenging regulatory approach.
SEC's Mute Stance on Ether Classification was Misleading, Says Patrick McHenry

Highlights

  • DeFi Fund & Beba challenge SEC on $BEBA token's security status.
  • Lawsuit claims SEC's crypto stance stifles innovation.
  • Beba's airdrop sparks legal debate over digital assets.

The DeFi Education Fund and Texas-based apparel company Beba have initiated a lawsuit against the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Brought in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas, the complaint questions the manner the SEC has adopted in digital asset regulation, especially its view towards the classification of certain tokens as securities.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Legal Challenge Over Token Classification

The essence of the legal suit is on the $BEBA token, which Beba distributed via airdrops. According to the plaintiffs, these tokens, which can be used to purchase exclusive elements in Beba’s online store, should not be considered as securities. They argue that the method of distribution and the use of the tokens fail to satisfy the Howey Test, which is employed by the SEC to ascertain if an asset is an investment contract and, thus, security.

The Howey Test demands money to be put into a common enterprise that yields an anticipated profit upon the efforts of others. Beba and the DeFi Education Fund claim that these conditions are not met for $BEBA airdrops, as their tokens are distributed for free, and there is no profit expectation based on the work of others.

Advertisement
Advertisement

SEC’s Regulatory Approach Under Scrutiny

The lawsuit additionally charges the SEC with violating the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), which requires federal agencies to develop rules through an open process consisting of public notice and comment. The plaintiffs assert that the SEC’s “regulate by enforcement” strategy has made the crypto industry uncertain and that it has not provided any clear guidelines or public participation. 

The complaint argues that this tactic has stifled innovation and burdened businesses that are looking to capitalize on digital assets in a legitimate manner.

Nathan Hennigh, co-founder of Beba, lamented,

“Like any business owner, I’m always thinking about new and innovative ways to reach more customers and grow support for our products. It’s unfortunate, but we operate in a state of constant uncertainty because of the SEC’s approach to digital assets, such as our $BEBA token.”

Consequently, the SEC has been provided with 60 days to answer the allegations in the complaint. This time frame is standard in proceedings of this kind, allowing the SEC to prepare and file a formal response. 

Read Also: XRP Lawsuit: Ripple CLO Slams SEC’s Soon-to-Be-Revealed $2B Fine

Advertisement
Kelvin Munene Murithi
Kelvin Munene is a crypto and finance journalist with over 5 years of experience, offering in-depth market analysis and expert commentary . With a Bachelor's degree in Journalism and Actuarial Science from Mount Kenya University, Kelvin is known for his meticulous research and strong writing skills, particularly in cryptocurrency, blockchain, and financial markets. His work has been featured across top industry publications such as Coingape, Cryptobasic, MetaNews, Cryptotimes, Coinedition, TheCoinrepublic, Cryptotale, and Analytics Insight among others, where he consistently provides timely updates and insightful content. Kelvin’s focus lies in uncovering emerging trends in the crypto space, delivering factual and data-driven analyses that help readers make informed decisions. His expertise extends across market cycles, technological innovations, and regulatory shifts that shape the crypto landscape. Beyond his professional achievements, Kelvin has a passion for chess, traveling, and exploring new adventures.
Why trust CoinGape: CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights to our readers. Our journalists and analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.
Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.