Binance Lawyers Ask Court to Throw Out $1.76B FTX Lawsuit Case

Binance moves to dismiss FTX’s $1.76B clawback lawsuit, claiming it lacks jurisdiction and factual basis.
By Coingape Staff
Binance Calls FTX's 1.76b lawsuit legally deficient.

Highlights

  • Binance seeks dismissal of FTX’s $1.76B clawback lawsuit, citing lack of jurisdiction.
  • The motion argues FTX is deflecting blame from Sam Bankman-Fried’s fraud.
  • Binance denies involvement in FTX’s collapse or misleading market actions.

Binance is fighting a $1.76 billion lawsuit from the FTX estate, seeking a Delaware court to dismiss it. The case centres on a 2021 equity buyback deal between the two crypto exchanges, which took place over a year before FTX collapsed. The crypto exchange argues the lawsuit is “legally flawed” and should be dismissed.

FTX says it used customer funds without permission to repurchase the exchange’s stake. But the firm’s lawyers claim the accusation is based on weak assumptions and lacks evidence.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Binance Accuses FTX of Avoiding Accountability

In its court filing, Binance argued that FTX is trying to shift blame away from its founder, Sam Bankman-Fried, who is serving a 25-year prison sentence for fraud. The exchange claims the lawsuit ignores the real reason for FTX’s failure, calling it “one of the biggest corporate frauds in history.”

The company also said it had no role in FTX’s collapse and emphasized that none of its executives. The company also defended the former CEO Changpeng Zhao saying that he was not directly involved in the 2021 deal.

FTX also blames a series of tweets by Zhao in November 2022—especially one about selling Binance’s FTT tokens—for sparking panic among users and speeding up its downfall. Binance pushed back, saying those tweets came after a CoinDesk report that had already raised major concerns about FTX’s finances.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Jurisdiction Challenge and Wider Impact

Binance is also disputing the court’s authority over the case, saying its companies are based outside the U.S. and weren’t directly responsible for any disputed fund transfers. This case is part of FTX’s larger effort to recover over $11 billion for customers and creditors.

With large bankruptcy payouts expected to begin on May 30, the outcome of this lawsuit against CZ could play a key role in how much FTX’s creditors end up receiving. The upcoming week is an important one for FTX Creditors as the bankrupt derivatives exchange FTX’s repayment process begins. 

Advertisement
Coingape Staff
CoinGape comprises an experienced team of native content writers and editors working round the clock to cover news globally and present news as a fact rather than an opinion. CoinGape writers and reporters contributed to this article.
Why trust CoinGape: CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights to our readers. Our journalists and analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.
Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.