Bitcoin (BTC) Price Trading in Post-Halving Danger Zone, How Much Can It Retrace?

Bhushan Akolkar
April 26, 2024
Why Trust CoinGape
CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights to our readers. Our journal analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.
Bitcoin price analysis

Highlights

  • Bitcoin post-halving correction to continue over next 15 days as per historical trends.
  • Bitcoin price likely to bounce back from its strong support at $60,000.
  • Bitcoin ETFs show decelerating registering net outflows in the last two days.

The world’s largest cryptocurrency Bitcoin came under selling pressure earlier this week falling under $65,000 as the US GDP growth and business activity slowed down. As of press time, the Bitcoin (BTC) price is trading at $64,256 with a market cap of $1,265 trillion.

Bitcoin price In Post-Halving ‘Danger Zone’

Crypto analyst Rekt Capital has raised concerns about a potential “Danger Zone” following Bitcoin’s recent halving event. Drawing parallels to historical trends from 2016, Rekt Capital highlights a significant downside wick of approximately -11% that occurred around 21 days after the Halving, before a subsequent upward reversal.

With Bitcoin currently 6 days post-halving, attention is drawn to the possibility of downside volatility around the Re-Accumulation Range Low. Rekt Capital warns that if history repeats itself, this downside volatility could manifest over the next 15 days, termed the “Danger Zone.” While this period ends in 15 days, there remains a possibility of downside volatility at the $60600 Range Low in the meantime, according to historical analysis.

Courtesy: Rekt Capital

Bitcoin’s struggles persist as it faces rejection from the $65,600 resistance level, failing to establish it as support. Over several weeks, Bitcoin price has consistently shown downward movement towards the $60,600 liquidity pool, marked in green.

On the other hand, Bitcoin critic Peter Schiff believes that $60,000 support won’t hold and that the Bitcoin price is heading for even lower levels.

Tech Stock Rout Puts Pressure on BTC

Bitcoin’s decline coincided with a downturn in major U.S. technology stocks, spurred by Meta Platforms Inc (NASDAQ: META) reporting a weaker-than-anticipated revenue forecast. Following Meta’s 15% decline in after-hours trading, industry giants Microsoft Corporation (NASDAQ: MSFT) and Alphabet Inc (NASDAQ: GOOGL) also experienced drops of 2% and 3%, respectively.

Traditionally, Bitcoin’s movement tends to mirror that of U.S. technology stocks, as both sectors are often seen as avenues for high-risk, high-return investments. However, this correlation had somewhat diminished earlier in the year, particularly with the introduction of spot exchange-traded funds in the U.S., which led to Bitcoin price outperformance.

However, amid the uncertain macro scenario, Bitcoin ETFs have registered net outflows showing a clear decelerating trend in the overall flows. Thursday’s GDP report, which fell short of expectations, has left the Fed in a tight spot, limiting its options going forward. The data’s implications have investors questioning the possibility of rate cuts by the Fed in 2024, pushing back expectations.

Advertisement
coingape google news coingape google news
Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.

Why Trust CoinGape

CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights Read more…to our readers. Our journal analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.

About Author
About Author
Bhushan is a seasoned crypto writer with over eight years of experience spanning more than 10,000 contributions across multiple platforms like CoinGape, CoinSpeaker, Bitcoinist, Crypto News Flash, and others. Being a Fintech enthusiast, he loves reporting across Crypto, Blockchain, DeFi, Global Macros with a keen understanding in financial markets. 

He is committed to continuous learning and stays motivated by sharing the knowledge he acquires. In his free time, Bhushan enjoys reading thriller fiction novels and occasionally explores his culinary skills. Bhushan has a bachelors degree in electronics engineering, however, his interest in finance and economics drives him to crypto and blockchain.
Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.