MEXCBitcoin Consensus Rules Questioned by Ripple CTO
Highlights
- Ripple CTO questions if hash power solely defines Bitcoin, challenging conventional beliefs.
- The Nakamoto consensus relies on the longest chain rule, where most computing effort validates blockchain.
- Schwartz's intervention prompts reflection on user autonomy and network governance in the Bitcoin ecosystem.
David Schwartz, the Chief Technology Officer of Ripple, has raised a point that has drawn attention to the process of centralizing the Bitcoin (BTC) hash power. With his intervention, Schwartz challenges the conventional wisdom that it is the majority of hash power that determines who gets to control the name “Bitcoin.” Responding to tweets, he not only questions the understanding but goes on to raise a fresh question, the one about the authority to define what is popularly known as Bitcoin.
Ripple CTO questioned whether a rational user would blindly accept whatever is called BTC, regardless of its qualities, honesty, or integrity. Schwartz emphasized the importance of distinguishing between what is labeled as Bitcoin and what users actually desire, suggesting that the former does not necessarily align with the latter’s preferences.
Role of Hash Power in Bitcoin Consensus
Hash power, the computational power used for mining and confirming transactions on the Bitcoin network, has long been seen as a key factor responsible for consensus. The Nakamoto consensus, the basis of the BTC network, uses the longest chain rule, which says that the chain with the most computing time is the legitimate one. This principle has served the integrity and security of the BTC network since day one.
Schwartz’s criticism raises the question of the level to which hash power actually authorizes the building of the Bitcoin identity. He gives an example of the Bitcoin Cash hard fork from 2017, where he claims that rational users did not immediately choose the team that claimed to retain the “Bitcoin” name after the fork. This goes against the idea that the majority of hash power dominantly defines the true essence of Bitcoin.
Examining Rational User Behavior in BTC Ecosystem
Schwartz’s intrusion into this type of operation gives rise to a reevaluation of user behavior within the BTC system. Providing an argument that adherents of Bitcoin could simply have labeled it by sticking “Bitcoin” without being able to be sure whether users blindly hold that on just the mere fact that those did not have any underlying principle or quality, not only has he made the case of the network governance, and also fellow users called for the reconsidering. Through this talk, it is shown that the more complex aspects of choice influence the Selection of Bitcoins and resistance to the network.
Read Also: Hong Kong’s Securities Association Tips Authorities On Crypto Self-Regulation
- Binance Responds to Charges of Supporting Trump-Family Crypto USD1 and WLFI Soon After CZ Pardon
- SpaceX Makes Third Huge Bitcoin Transfer in 10 Days, Is Elon Musk Planning Something Big?
- Crypto Market Tumbles as Jerome Powell Says December Rate Cut ‘Far From Certain’
- FOMC Meeting: Federal Reserve Lowers Interest Rates by 25 Bps in Second Cut of the Year
- WLF Token Jumps 7% as Former Robinhood Counsel Joins Trump-Backed World Liberty Financial
- Ethereum Price Flips BTC in Strategy Shift, Eyes $4500 Level
- Expert Predicts XRP Price to Hit $10 as Elliot Wave, XRPR ETF Inflows Align
- HYPE Price Prediction as 21Shares Files S-1 for Hyperliquid ETF—Can Bulls Push HYPE to $60?
- Bitcoin Price Rally Bound? How the Fed’s Move May Unleash Crypto
- Can ASTER Price Rebound 50% as Whale Activity and Bullish Pattern Align?
- Pi Network Patterns Point to More Gains Despite Manipulation Claims
Why Trust CoinGape
CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights Read more…to our readers. Our journal analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.
