Bitcoin ETF Sparks Debate Between Legitimacy and Investment Purism

Shraddha Sharma
January 14, 2024
Why Trust CoinGape
CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights to our readers. Our journal analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.
Taiwan Puts Bitcoin ETF under Watch; People to Resume Buying Overseas ETF?

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) nod to Bitcoin ETFs has circled through the crypto sector. It has sparked both optimism and some skepticism.

Gerald Goh, co-founder and CEO of crypto bank Sygnum Singapore, is positive. Goh views the SEC’s approval as a key marker for Bitcoin’s legitimacy. The official recently said in an interview that it paves the way for institutional players to embrace crypto, potentially ushering in its mainstream adoption.

Contrasting this enthusiasm is “Shark Tank” personality Kevin O’Leary, who remains unimpressed. During a Fox Business interview, O’Leary, a self-professed Bitcoin purist, dismissed the idea of investing in ETFs. He questioned the rationale behind paying additional fees for ETFs, asserting that they offer no value to long-term Bitcoin holders like him.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Bitcoin ETF debate reignites

Investing in Bitcoin through ETPs carries a blend of advantages as an investment. But it has its drawbacks. ETFs make access easy for traditional investors who do not handle wallets.

There is enhanced legitimacy, which provides for potential broader market participation. Bitcoin ETFs don’t need to directly manage the king coin.

Additionally, they allow for integration into diversified portfolios with market oversight. And naturally, it offers a sense of security for some investors.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Additional costs are discouraging

With BTC ETF players, the major competition is around administration fees. Any management fees erode investor profits.

Additionally, funds may not perfectly track the price of Bitcoin due to the structure of the fund. 11 of the approved Bitcoin ETFs are seeing different levels of fund flow and assets under management (AUM) due to this difference in structure.

For Bitcoin purists, ETFs might not mean holding the actual cryptocurrency. In this case, it is bitcoin. And therefore, the freedom of a decentralized system is overshadowed by the security of traditional financial products.

ETF investors also do not get to choose the storage and security methods for their digital assets.

Advertisement
Advertisement

BTC ETF vs BTC price

Cryptocurrency analyst Michaël van de Poppe recently noted the impact of the Bitcoin ETF on the market.

Van de Poppe pointed out that while the ETP initially led to a price drop from $48,000, investors shouldn’t judge the launch by it.

According to him, the price dip is a short-term effect due to investors shifting from holding actual Bitcoin to investing in the ETF.

He viewed this shift as temporary sell pressure and remained bullish on the long-term prospects, predicting that Bitcoin’s value would exceed $200,000. His advice to investors has been to “buy the dip.”

Also Read: Bitcoin ETF Stumbles: CNBC’s Neuner Terms Launch a Failure

Advertisement
coingape google news coingape google news
Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.

Why Trust CoinGape

CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights Read more…to our readers. Our journal analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.

About Author
About Author
Shraddha's professional journey spans over five years, during which she worked as a financial journalist, covering business, markets, and cryptocurrencies. As a reporter, she has placed particular emphasis to learn about the market interaction with emerging technologies.
Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.