Bitcoin Sell-off Might be Linked Two of the Largest Scams in its History

By Nivesh Rustgi
Updated July 17, 2025
bitcoin scams history mt.gox

Bitcoin and crypto-markets are teetering from a massive sell, this close to halving. The markets were looking fairly bullish early in February. However, things seems to have to taken an ugly turn too fast.

In the midst of bullish fundamentals, one of the reasons that this can be attributed to is the selling pressure from scams. According to an independent research, PlusToken Scam coins are on the move again, while the rate of distribution is slower than last year, the sell-off is still significant.

PlusToken Scammers Mark High?

As reported earlier on CoinGape, on 11th February, about 20,000 Bitcoins were moved to one large address which was further distributed to smaller accounts.

The next movement in the smaller BTC addresses was witnessed on 17th February. Post which, the final transactions on those addresses were logged on 6th and 7th March 2019.

btc plustoken dump
Addresses Associated with PlusToken Scam BTC

In total, about 187,000 Bitcoins and other cryptocurrencies like ETH were siphoned in the scam. In the latter half of 2018 (since August), this can created a lot of selling pressure in the market.

This is around the same time when Ergo reports Bitcoins being sent to a mixer. Moreover, on 3rd March 2020, $100 million dollar in Ethereum was also moved across the blockchain. Hence, it seems quite evident that the scammers are unloading onto the market.

Ghosts of the Past: Mt. Gox

Furthermore, the Mt. Gox settlement is also nearing its end. The trustees and the creditors are currently liable to about 141,000 BTC that was left from the 850,000 BTC hack. Leading on-chain analyst, David Puell had warned of a possible sell-off in March due to this.

According to recent reports, a settlement of about 88% in USD value has been proposed to the victims of the hack by the Trustees of the Japanese defunct exchange. NY based Fortress Investment Group is willing to stake claims on all the 141k BTC by paying out the investors.

Fortress claims to make the payout to the investors after acceptance in 3 days.This could create a log of selling pressure in the market, on acceptance and announcement of reimbursement dates.

Nevertheless, the total amount of Bitcoins are further entangled in another lawsuit with CoinLab and Tibanne, who claim major portions as well.

Do you think that scams and sell-offs will throw Bitcoin into another long-term bear market? Please share your views with us. 

Advertisement
Nivesh Rustgi
Nivesh from Engineering Background is a full-time Crypto Analyst at Coingape. He is an atheist who believes in love and cultural diversity. He believes that Cryptocurrency is a necessity to deter corruption. He holds small amounts of cryptocurrencies. Faith and fear are two sides of the same coin. Follow him on X at @nivishoes or mail him at nivesh(at)coingape.com
Why trust CoinGape: CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights to our readers. Our journalists and analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.
Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.