Bitcoin User Pays A Whopping $3.1 Mln Transaction Fees For 139 BTC Transfer

A Bitcoin user was left with only 55.7 Bitcoins after paying $3.1 million in transaction fees while transferring 139 BTC.
By Coingape Staff
Bitcoin (BTC) Price Drop Risks $250 Mln Long Liquidation

A Bitcoin user has managed to pay a staggering $3.1 million in transaction fees for transferring 139.42 BTC, receiving only 55.77 BTC in return. This incident, marking the 8th highest transaction fee in Bitcoin’s 14-year history, has left the crypto community in awe and speculation.

The BTC wallet address bc1qn3d…wekrnl initiated the hefty transfer of 139.42 BTC to bc1qyf…km36t4 on November 23. However, the sender found themselves unwittingly paying an exorbitant transaction fee, capturing the attention of the mining pool Antpool, which verified the transaction on block 818087.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Suspecting: Bitcoins Sent By RBF Policy

Social media buzzed with speculation, attributing the astronomical fee to the sender’s choice, the Replace-By-Fee (RBF) node policy, and potential unawareness.

RBF enables the replacement of an unconfirmed cryptocurrency transaction with a higher fee, speeding up its clearance. The sender may have selected a high fee intentionally, but RBF and potential unawareness likely played a role.

A mempool developer known as Mononaut chimed in on X, suggesting that the user might not have known that RBF orders are irrevocable. The sender may have attempted to cancel the fee by replacing it multiple times, with the last replacement spiking the fee by an additional 20%, tacking on 12.54824636 BTC in fees.

Another user named BitcoinBadger has weighed in, suggesting that the excessive fee may not be a mere oversight but a deliberate move to allocate funds to a specific miner or mining pool.

Also Read: Pyth Network (PYTH) Maintains Bullish Sentiment Amid Impressive Price Surge

Advertisement
Advertisement

Not The First Time

Interestingly, this isn’t the first instance of a Bitcoin user inadvertently paying an astronomical transaction fee. In September, Paxos accidentally sent $500,000 in fees for a $2000 BTC transfer.  However, F2pool, the verifying miner, returned the accidental fee, highlighting a stark contrast to the current situation with Antpool.

Mononaut emphasized that the likelihood of Antpool returning the funds depends on its payout policies and obligations to share transaction fees with miners, raising anticipation for the mining pool’s response.

The massive amount of gas fees was not only addressed by Bitcoin-knowledgeable peeps but also by critics. People have also mocked the payment system satirically by saying “future of payment system.”

BitcoinBadger’s insight adds a layer of speculation and complexity to the growing story of the high transaction cost, contributing to the broader discourse about the complexities of Bitcoin transactions and the importance of an informed user base.

Also Read: Binance To Delist BTC And ETH Margin Trading Pairs Amid Legal Woes

Advertisement
Coingape Staff
CoinGape comprises an experienced team of native content writers and editors working round the clock to cover news globally and present news as a fact rather than an opinion. CoinGape writers and reporters contributed to this article.
Why trust CoinGape: CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights to our readers. Our journalists and analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.
Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.