BlackRock Might Backtrack on Ethereum ETF Application Amid ‘Very Little’ Demand

BlackRock's Ethereum ETF is currently under consideration by the SEC, but the client demand seems low at this point.
By Bhushan Akolkar
Bitwise Files Proposal To Enable Staking on Ethereum ETF

Highlights

  • BlackRock says client demand for Ethereum is very little in comparison to Bitcoin.
  • BlackRock executive clarified that their focus isn't on offering wide range of crypto services.
  • US SEC seems to waging a war against Ethereum, trying to give it a 'security tag' like XRP.

After its successful launch of the spot Bitcoin ETF in January 2024, the world’s largest asset manager BlackRock has been pushing ahead for a spot Ethereum ETF application. However, chances are that the asset manager might reconsider its efforts citing “little” demand from clients for Ethereum, in comparison to Bitcoin.

Will BlackRock Continue the Push for spot Ethereum ETF?

During a fireside chat at the Friday Bitcoin Investor Day conference in New York, Robert Mitchnick, BlackRock’s head of digital assets, emphasized the firm’s client base’s primary focus on Bitcoin. He noted, “I can say that for our client base, bitcoin is overwhelmingly the number one focus and a little bit Ethereum”. He also mentioned that the demand for every other crypto asset is “very, very little.”

However, he didn’t comment anything for now on whether BlackRock will continue or not on its pursuit of Ethereum ETF approval. Last week, BlackRock got Digital Assets Product Strategist Matt Kunk on board to lead the company’s efforts on iShares digital assets ETFs. Ethereum proponents have come in defense of the asset class.

For now, the US SEC has delayed BlackRock’s Ethereum ETF application to May 2024. There have been ongoing discussions that BlackRock will also pursue ETFs for other digital assets. Mitchnick clarified that there’s a misconception within the crypto industry regarding the asset manager’s intentions to offer a wide array of other services. “That’s not our primary focus,” he emphasized.

On the other hand, BlackRock continues to explore the industry. The asset manager recently announced the launch of its BUIDL stablecoin on Ethereum blockchain, as part of its tokenization efforts.

Will the US SEC Wage A War Against Ethereum?

There are strong discussions in the industry that the US SEC is considering putting a ‘security tag’ for Ethereum just like they did with XRP. This might further reduce the chances of the Ethereum ETF approval by the securities regulator.

According to Alex Thorn, head of firmwide research at Galaxy Digital, if the SEC is inquiring about crypto firms’ interactions with the Ethereum Foundation, it could indicate scrutiny over whether the original Ethereum initial coin offering (ICO) in 2014 was an unregistered securities offering, rather than just categorizing the current secondary trading of ETH as securities trading.

Thorn speculated that while the SEC might distinguish between the ICO and the present secondary trading of ETH, taking any enforcement action against the Ethereum Foundation nearly a decade later would be “highly unusual.”

However, crypto industry players like Coinbase have come in support of Ethereum stating that CFTC and the SEC cannot have different takes on the asset class.

Advertisement
Bhushan Akolkar
Bhushan is a seasoned crypto writer with over eight years of experience spanning more than 10,000 contributions across multiple platforms like CoinGape, CoinSpeaker, Bitcoinist, Crypto News Flash, and others. Being a Fintech enthusiast, he loves reporting across Crypto, Blockchain, DeFi, Global Macros with a keen understanding in financial markets. 

He is committed to continuous learning and stays motivated by sharing the knowledge he acquires. In his free time, Bhushan enjoys reading thriller fiction novels and occasionally explores his culinary skills. Bhushan has a bachelors degree in electronics engineering, however, his interest in finance and economics drives him to crypto and blockchain.
Why trust CoinGape: CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights to our readers. Our journalists and analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.
Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.