BlackRock’s Bitcoin ETF Filing Suggests Possible Kill Switch
In a recent development that has caught the attention of the cryptocurrency community, BlackRock, the world’s largest asset manager, updated its S-1 filing for a proposed Bitcoin exchange-traded fund (ETF). This amendment, made following discussions with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), has sparked speculation about a possible regulatory “kill switch” embedded within the ETF’s framework.
SEC’s Influence on BlackRock’s Bitcoin ETF Proposal
BlackRock’s revised filing includes stark warnings about the consequences if regulators classify Bitcoin as a security. According to the document, this change in the regulatory stance could significantly impact both Bitcoin’s trading value and the ETF shares. The example of XRP, which experienced a drastic price drop following the SEC’s enforcement action against Ripple Labs, is cited as a precedent.
Legal professionals and industry insiders have taken note of this development. Tuur Demeester, founder of Adamant Research, speculated on the possibility of the SEC demanding a “kill switch” for the Bitcoin ETF. Similarly, legal expert Joe Carlasare described the amendment as “interesting,” indicating that it might have been prompted by the SEC’s insistence on including a disclosure about the security risk.
Caitlin Long, CEO of Avanti Bank, linked the update from BlackRock to a proposed law in New Jersey, which would categorize virtual currencies as securities when sold to institutional investors. This connection has led to further conjecture about the potential for a hidden agenda against Bitcoin within the ETF documentation.
Differing Perspectives on BlackRock’s ETF Amendment
While some view this amendment with suspicion, others see it as standard legal practice in the ETF approval process. An industry commentator, citing sources within the SEC, downplayed the immediate concerns, suggesting that the amendment is a typical example of legal caution. However, Carlasare later stated that he has reliable information confirming the SEC’s role in dictating this contentious language.
The discussion around BlackRock’s amended ETF highlights the SEC’s significant influence over the future of Bitcoin ETFs. The Commission’s rigorous compliance demands reflect its cautious stance towards cryptocurrencies, a position often perceived as unfriendly by the crypto industry.
Read Also: DOJ Set to Announce Binance Settlement Today
- BitGo To Follow Gemini’s Footsteps With US IPO After 4x Revenue Surge
- Michael Saylor Predicts Bitcoin Will Outperform S&P 500 Forever
- Crypto Market Eyes Upside as FTX Set to Repay $1.6B to Customers
- Elon Musk’s X Vows Crackdown on Bribery Network Behind Crypto Scam Accounts
- Flare Unveils First XRP-Backed Stablecoin, Boosting XRP’s Utility
- Chainlink Price Prediction: Whales Scoop 2M LINK as Analysts Eye 184% Breakout Rally
- Shiba Inu (SHIB) Price Prediction: Massive SHIB Burn and 80-Week Cycle Mirroring Past Rallies: Will History Repeat?
- Cardano Price Stays Above Ichimoku Cloud as Grayscale ADA ETF Approval Nears
- HBAR Price Prediction as SEC Approves Generic ETF Framework – Analyst Targets $1.80
- Toshi Coin Gains 57% in One Day: What’s Driving the Sudden Upside?
- Shiba Inu Price Set to Soar as Exchange Reserves Dive Amid SHIB ETF Chatter
Why Trust CoinGape
CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights Read more…to our readers. Our journal analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.
