MEXCBreaking: FTX Sues Sam-Bankman Fried, Michael Giles, And Silicon Valley VCs
FTX filed multiple lawsuits in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware on May 17 to recover funds from former FTX executives including Sam Bankman-Fried and other parties that benefitted from Embed Financial Technologies’s acquisition.
FTX Trading (Debtors), along with Alameda Research and West Realm Shires (Plaintiff) sued former CEO Sam Bankman-Fried, Nishad Singh, and Gary Wang in a lawsuit. FTX also filed separate lawsuits to recover funds from Embed founder Michael Giles and venture capital firms.
Also Read: Indian Apex Web3 Body, Crypto Exchanges Push To Restore UPI Access
FTX Files Lawsuit Against Sam Bankman-Fried to Recover Funds
According to a lawsuit filed in the Delaware bankruptcy court, lawyers representing FTX, Alameda Research, and West Realm Shires seek to claw back $250 million from Sam Bankman-Fried, Nishad Singh, and Zixiao “Gary” Wang. Former executives used FTX customer funds to acquire Embed in March 2022.
The plaintiffs failed to conduct proper due diligence for Embed’s acquisition and overpaid for the acquisition. FTX insiders produced misleading records to cover Alameda’s role in funding the acquisition.
After four months of completing the Embed acquisition, no bidder is willing to pay more than $1 million. Among the 12 bidders, only one has submitted a final bid to buy Embed for only $250,000.
FTX also filed separate lawsuits to claw back funds from Embed founder Michael Giles and early investors that transferred equities and other assets to Sam Bankman-Fried and other parties involved in the acquisition.
The investors in the adversary cases include prominent Silicon Valley firms that held stakes in Embed, including Y Combinator, Bain Capital Ventures, and 9Yards.
Also Read: Do Kwon and Terraform Labs Withdraw Millions A Year After Terra-LUNA Crisis
Sam Bankman-Fried Seeks Dismissal of Charges
Sam Bankman-Fried earlier this month asked U.S. District Judge Lewis Kaplan to dismiss most of the charges against him. SBF also believes a recent Supreme Court decision limiting the scope of fraud prosecutions makes him eligible for charges to be dismissed.
He says that some charges were based on a theory of fraud, but legal experts say that SBF’s chances of getting rid of the charges are still low.
Also Read: Ethereum, Polygon Developers Skeptical Of OpenAI CEO’s Worldcoin
- BitMine Buys $29 Million in Ethereum as Kalshi Traders Cut $5K Price Odds to 34%
- Bitwise XRP ETF Moves Closer to Launch as Firm Submits Final S-1 Filing
- MEXC Denies Insolvency Rumors, Faces Record Withdrawals as Users Seek Proof of Solvency
- $7B Virtu Financial Holds $63M XRP as Whales Accelerate Daily Sell-Off
- Breaking: Coinbase Nears $2B Deal to Buy Stablecoin Platform BVNK
- Why Is TAO Price Skyrocketing Today?
- After 1,993% Burn Spike, Is Shiba Inu Price Set for a Major Trend Reversal?
- Pepe Coin Price Forms Multi-Year H&S Pattern as Whale Selling Intensifies
- Ethereum Price Forecast: $5K in Sight Post-Fusaka Upgrade
- Chainlink Price Eyes $25 as AllUnity Integrates CCIP for EURAU Expansion
- Sei Price Forecast: Will Robinhood Listing Spark a Rally?
Why Trust CoinGape
CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights Read more…to our readers. Our journal analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.
