Breaking: Grayscale Makes Amended Bitcoin ETF Filing After Silbert’s Exit

Grayscale has filed another amendment with the SEC to convert its Grayscale Bitcoin Trust into a Bitcoin ETF on Tuesday.
By Shraddha Sharma
Bitcoin ETF digital asset Inflow

Grayscale has made another amended S-3 filing with the securities regulator, reported Bloomberg’s James Seyffart on Tuesday. The news came in hours after Grayscale Investments’ chairman, Barry Silbert, stepped down from the position.

 Also Read: Grayscale Investments Reshuffles Board as Barry Silbert Steps Down

Advertisement
Advertisement

Grayscale accepts cash mandate

The filing is to convert the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust (GBTC) fund into a Bitcoin ETF. Seyffart reported that Grayscale is apparently “bending the knee” as it accepts the SEC’s mandate on cash-only orders.

The filing underlines, “Although the Trust creates Baskets only upon receipt of Bitcoins, and redeems Baskets only by distributing Bitcoins, at this time an Authorized Participant can only submit Cash Orders…”

“The Trust is currently able to accept Cash Orders,” the document added.

Notably, an S-3 form is a regulatory filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to issue new shares or convert existing securities into a different type.

The asset manager has updated its 2018 filing more than once. In November, it proposed two changes; the first one changed how they collect fees from a monthly to a daily fee structure. Secondly, it modified how assets are combined in an omnibus account to simplify the process of creating and redeeming shares.

Grayscale appears to be gearing up for competition with major players like BlackRock in the exchange-traded fund (ETF) market as they make strategic updates ahead of the crucial approval deadline in January.

Also Read: Grayscale Makes Two Key Amendments to Transfer its GBTC to spot Bitcoin ETF

Advertisement
Advertisement

ETFs can be disruptive

Meanwhile, Bloomberg’s senior analyst Eric Balchunas took to X to reiterate that ETFs are disruptive as they offer low-cost investment options.

He refers to recent comments from a cryptocurrency exchange leader who warned that Bitcoin could disappear if ETFs were to get approved, viewing this as fear-mongering similar to what was seen with high-fee active managers and hedge funds.

Balchunas highlights the stark contrast in earnings between crypto exchanges and ETF markets, despite the former having significantly less volume. The analyst notes that crypto exchanges earn much more and suggests that the introduction of cost-effective ETFs could significantly challenge the current profitable model of many crypto exchanges.

Also Read: Spot Bitcoin ETF Approval Can Allow More Crypto Exposure to 401(k) Retirement Plan

Advertisement
Shraddha Sharma
Shraddha's professional journey spans over five years, during which she worked as a financial journalist, covering business, markets, and cryptocurrencies. As a reporter, she has placed particular emphasis to learn about the market interaction with emerging technologies.
Why trust CoinGape: CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights to our readers. Our journalists and analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.
Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.