Breaking: Over 41 Addresses Identified In $190 Million Nomad Hack

Ashish Kumar
August 2, 2022
Why Trust CoinGape
CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights to our readers. Our journal analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.
tornado cash

The global digital asset market wakes to the 5th largest DeFi hack of all time. Nearly $200 million were drained from the Nomad, a bridge protocol. According to a blockchain security firm, more than 41 addresses have been identified which grabbed millions of dollars during the theft.

Advertisement
Advertisement

41 address grabbed over $152 million in Nomad Hack

As per PeckShield, 41 addresses grabbed over $152 million in the Nomad bridge exploit. It amounted to 80% of the total hack. This includes 7 MEV Bots, 7 Rari Capital Arbitrum exploiter, and 6 White Hat.

It added that around 10% of these addresses with the ENS names got $6.1 million out of this exploit. While MEV Bots grabbed $7.1 million and Rari Arbitrum exploiter took $3.4 million.

After this major attack Nomad has landed on the list of biggest exploits in 2022. However, this hack was slightly different from the others as the funds drained out the protocol over hours and in small batches.

Advertisement
Advertisement

First hackers were not well skilled

Mudit Gupta, CISO at Polygon, in a Twitter thread said that the attacker could have taken everything in a single transaction in the Nomad hack. However, they didn’t do that and got the front run. He mentioned that the front run was done from both whitehats and blackhats.

He added that if the first attacker had the required and right skills they could have taken all the funds using smart contracts in a single transaction. However, this was a smart contract hack and not a key compromise.

Gupta mentioned that this could have been avoided by better tests, fuzzing, and some formal verification. Meanwhile, he concluded that Decentralized bridges are complex and hard to secure.

Zellic, a blockchain security firm mentioned understanding bugs isn’t enough. It is important to stop merging them. It mentioned that the first hack transaction recorded was $2.322 million worth of Wrapped Bitcoin (WBTC).

However, he added this was initiated directly with the bridge by calling a single function, process (). This function is solely responsible for executing cross chain exchanges and it is very critical.

Advertisement
Advertisement

What’s Nomad’s take over it?

During the hack, Nomad took to Twitter and wrote that they are aware that some people are posing as Nomad and providing fraudulent addresses. It mentioned that they are not providing instructions on the return of bridge funds.

Later it reported that they are investigating the hack and will provide updates on it. However, no further update has been given by the team.

Advertisement
coingape google news coingape google news
Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.

Why Trust CoinGape

CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights Read more…to our readers. Our journal analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.

About Author
About Author
Ashish believes in Decentralisation and has a keen interest in evolving Blockchain technology, Cryptocurrency ecosystem, and NFTs. He aims to create awareness around the growing Crypto industry through his writings and analysis. When he is not writing, he is playing video games, watching some thriller movie, or is out for some outdoor sports. Reach me at [email protected]
Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.