Breaking: SEC Has Not Approved BlackRock’s Spot Bitcoin ETF

The claim that the US SEC has approved BlackRock's spot Bitcoin ETF product has been declared false by the investment giant
By Godfrey Benjamin

The investment community was initially abuzz with excitement as rumors swirled on social media about the approval of BlackRock’s spot Bitcoin ETF. However, those hopes were dashed when BlackRock clarified that their application is still under review by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). 

Advertisement
Advertisement

BlackRock Bitcoin ETF Rumor and Market Reaction

Rumors of the SEC approving BlackRock’s spot BTC ETF application spread like wildfire on social media earlier today. These unverified claims led to a more than 10% surge in the price of Bitcoin, which momentarily approached the $30,000 mark, according to on-chain data. These gains, however, were short-lived, as the market swiftly corrected itself.

Eleanor Terret, a news reporter for Fox Business, took to social media platform X to confirm the truth. BlackRock had indeed not received approval for their Bitcoin ETF application. In the post, she stated, 

“BlackRock has just confirmed to me that this is false. Their application is still under review.”

The recent rumors about BlackRock’s Bitcoin ETF approval coincided with the SEC’s announcement that it would not appeal Grayscale’s court ruling. This ruling required the SEC to reconsider Grayscale’s proposal to convert its flagship GBTC fund into a spot Bitcoin ETF. While this decision might be seen as a positive development in the path towards Bitcoin ETFs, it does not guarantee approval.

Advertisement
Advertisement

The SEC’s Ongoing Review Process

The SEC has been at the center of the Bitcoin ETF approval process, and it remains a crucial factor in the journey toward regulatory acceptance of such financial instruments.

Last month, the SEC announced that it was instituting additional proceedings to assess whether proposed spot BTC ETFs from prominent names like BlackRock, Invesco, Valkyrie, and Fidelity among others should be approved or disapproved. This step seemed to introduce yet another layer of review, potentially extending the ongoing deliberation for at least another month.

The SEC’s cautious approach is rooted in concerns about market manipulation, investor protection, and ensuring that sufficient safeguards are in place before green-lighting Bitcoin ETFs. The SEC’s regulatory stance is one of careful consideration and deliberation, and it remains to be seen when, or if, the regulator will approve such ETFs.

Advertisement
Godfrey Benjamin
Benjamin Godfrey is a blockchain enthusiast and journalists who relish writing about the real life applications of blockchain technology and innovations to drive general acceptance and worldwide integration of the emerging technology. His desires to educate people about cryptocurrencies inspires his contributions to renowned blockchain based media and sites. Benjamin Godfrey is a lover of sports and agriculture. Follow him on X, Linkedin
Why trust CoinGape: CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights to our readers. Our journalists and analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.
Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.