Breaking: Singapore Court Rules Crypto As Property In ByBit Judgement

Coingapestaff
July 26, 2023
Why Trust CoinGape
CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights to our readers. Our journal analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.
Singapore Money Laundering

The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) has only recently asked that Singaporean crypto service providers deposit client assets under a statutory trust before the year is up. In Singapore, the future of cryptocurrencies will also be decided today by yet another High Court ruling. The High Court of Singapore has recognized cryptocurrency as a type of property that can be held in trust.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Crypto Judgment From Case Involving ByBit

In a case brought by ByBit against its former employee, Ho Kai Xin, Judge Jeyaretnam rendered his decision. According to ByBit, the employee transferred almost 4.2 million USDT from the cryptocurrency exchange to her personal accounts. Ho has been claiming that a distant cousin is in charge of the pertinent accounts, and the court has now ordered him to refund all of the money to ByBit.

Even if the choice may appear clear, it contains key formulations that are crucial for the legal standing of digital assets. The stolen USDT and all cryptocurrencies are considered property by Judge Jeyaretnam. He said, “The physical manifestation at the level of digital bits and bytes is not permanent, and changes with every transaction. Nonetheless, we identify what is going on as a particular digital token, somewhat like how we give a name to a river even though the water contained within its banks is constantly changing.”

The decision stated that since we cannot hold digital assets in the same way that we can possess tangible ones like vehicles or jewelry, they cannot be classified as physical assets. They lack a consistent bodily identity. 

Judge stated that however, crypto assets do appear in the real world, although in a way that people cannot see. The preceding cryptographic lock is released by combining the Private Key and Public Key, which locks the unspent transaction output of the crypto asset to the owner’s public Address on the blockchain.

Also Read: Ripple Partner Volante To Take FedNow Cross-Border After Regulation, XRP To $1?

Advertisement
Advertisement

Singapore And Crypto

The MAS has been working on the fate of crypto regulations for a long time. In support of his ruling, the Judge referred to the consultation paper by MAS, which will adopt segregation and custody regulations for digital payment tokens. The Judge points out that it should be legally possible to hold such digital assets on trust given that one can identify and separate them.

Before the end of the year, MAS will compel Digital Payment Token (DPT) service providers to store customer funds under a statutory trust and prohibit crypto lending and staking for retail users. The MAS stated that it will take steps to guarantee that its policies remain balanced and pertinent by keeping an eye on market developments and consumer risk awareness as they change.

Also Read: Dogecoin Price Up 10%; Will X (Twitter) Hype Move Price Past $0.09?

Advertisement
coingape google news coingape google news
Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.

Why Trust CoinGape

CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights Read more…to our readers. Our journal analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.

About Author
About Author
CoinGape comprises an experienced team of native content writers and editors working round the clock to cover news globally and present news as a fact rather than an opinion. CoinGape writers and reporters contributed to this article.
Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.