Cardano’s Charles Hoskinson Joins Backlash Against Google’s “Racist” Gemini AI

Cardano's Charles Hoskinson joins tech leaders in condemning Google's Gemini AI for producing 'racist' images.
By Rupam Roy
Updated May 28, 2025
Ryan Selkis Elon Musk Charles Hoskinson Google search Alphabet Donald Trump

Highlights

  • Google faces backlash over flawed image generation feature, reigniting discussions about AI bias.
  • Charles Hoskinson criticizes Google's Gemini AI for generating inaccurate and offensive images.
  • Industry leaders call for transparency and accountability in tech companies' AI practices.

Amid a wave of criticism, Cardano founder Charles Hoskinson has joined prominent voices condemning Google’s Gemini AI for its controversial image generation feature. The tech giant’s attempt at inclusivity backfired as the feature produced inaccurate and offensive images, sparking outrage across social media platforms. Most notably, prominent figures from the technology as well as other industries have criticized Google’s Gemini image creation calling it “racist”.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Charles Hoskinson Calls Out Google’s AI Ethics

In a scathing post, Charles Hoskinson criticized Google’s approach to AI, labeling it as “racist” and detrimental to society. He expressed concerns over the radical politicization of human cognition and knowledge, emphasizing the need for ethical AI development that respects diverse perspectives.

Meanwhile, responding to a user’s comment, Hoskinson defended his stance, highlighting the universal impact of AI and the importance of addressing systemic biases. Notably, his remarks underscore the growing scrutiny surrounding AI technologies and the ethical responsibilities of tech companies.

On the other hand, X owner Elon Musk has also recently weighed in on the controversy, lambasting Google for its handling of the Gemini AI’s image-generation capabilities. Precisely, Musk denounced Google’s actions as “insane” and “anti-civilizational,” further fueling the debate over AI ethics and accountability.

Also Read: Bitwise Bitcoin ETF Heats Competition With Approval By $100 Bln AUM Investment Firm

Advertisement
Advertisement

Backlash Over Controversial Image Creation

Google’s apology for the flawed image generation feature comes amidst mounting criticism from industry leaders and users alike. The tech giant’s misstep has reignited discussions about bias in AI algorithms and the need for robust ethical guidelines in AI development.

Among others, Republican leader Vivek Ramaswamy echoed concerns about Google’s ideological echo chamber, citing the company’s failure to address inherent biases in its AI programming. In addition, he emphasized the importance of transparency and accountability in tech companies’ practices to prevent further instances of biased artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms.

Meanwhile, as Google works to rectify the shortcomings of Gemini AI, the incident serves as a stark reminder of the challenges and responsibilities associated with deploying AI technologies in today’s increasingly interconnected world.

Also Read: US DOJ Tightens Grip on Binance Ex-CEO Changpeng “CZ” Zhao

Advertisement
Rupam Roy
Rupam is a seasoned professional with three years of experience in the financial market, where he has developed a reputation as a meticulous research analyst and insightful journalist. He thrives on exploring the dynamic nuances of the financial landscape. Currently serving as a sub-editor at Coingape, Rupam's expertise extends beyond conventional boundaries. His role involves breaking stories, analyzing AI-related developments, providing real-time updates on the crypto market, and presenting insightful economic news. Rupam's career is characterized by a deep passion for unraveling the complexities of finance and delivering impactful stories that resonate with a diverse audience.
Why trust CoinGape: CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights to our readers. Our journalists and analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.
Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.