Caroline Ellison Admits Alameda Research Maintains 7 Alternative Balance Sheets

Godfrey Benjamin
October 11, 2023
Why Trust CoinGape
CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights to our readers. Our journal analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.
deribit alameda research

Caroline Ellison, the former CEO of Alameda Research, a subsidiary firm of the defunct FTX exchange has admitted to providing seven different balance sheets.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Ellison’s New Testimony

Ellison’s testimony, delivered on the sixth day of Sam Bankman-Fried’s trial, exposed a web of deceit surrounding Alameda Research’s financials. She claimed that Bankman-Fried had instructed her to create “alternative” balance sheets, designed to mislead Genesis lenders about Alameda’s use of funds from FTX Derivatives Exchange. 

Ellison testified that she provided seven different spreadsheets, one of which was presented to Genesis. Notably, the spreadsheet failed to disclose that Alameda had borrowed a staggering $10 billion from FTX.

During her testimony, Ellison recounted her conversation with SBF, stating, “Sam said, ‘Don’t send the balance sheet to Genesis.’ We were borrowing $10 billion from FTX, and we had $5 billion in loans to our own executives and affiliated entities. We thought Genesis might share the info.” This revelation suggests a deliberate effort to conceal significant financial dealings from key stakeholders.

In a revealing moment, Ellison expressed her concerns about potential customer withdrawals from FTX and the harm that could come from the truth being exposed. She admitted to feeling uncomfortable about her actions when questioned by the prosecution, stating that they were “dishonest” and “wrong.”

Advertisement
Advertisement

Caroline Ellison Plays the Blame Game

Throughout the trial, Ellison has largely placed the blame for the events surrounding the collapse of FTX on Sam Bankman-Fried. She alleges that Bankman-Fried directed the misuse of customer funds, while the defense seeks to portray her as the instigator. The trial’s outcome may hinge on the jury’s perception of where ultimate responsibility lies.

Ellison is deemed the key witness for the prosecution in Bankaman-Fried’s trial, following the testimony of FTX co-founder and former CTO Gary Wang. The trial has also named former FTX engineering director Nishad Singh as a potential witness, part of an agreement with the United States Justice Department.

Meanwhile, prosecutors indicated that they expect to rest their case on October 26 or October 27, at which point the defense will begin calling witnesses. Bankman-Fried has pleaded not guilty to seven criminal counts related to fraud at FTX and faces an additional five charges to be addressed in a March 2024 trial.

Advertisement
coingape google news coingape google news
Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.

Why Trust CoinGape

CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights Read more…to our readers. Our journal analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.

About Author
About Author
Benjamin Godfrey is a blockchain enthusiast and journalists who relish writing about the real life applications of blockchain technology and innovations to drive general acceptance and worldwide integration of the emerging technology. His desires to educate people about cryptocurrencies inspires his contributions to renowned blockchain based media and sites. Benjamin Godfrey is a lover of sports and agriculture. Follow him on X, Linkedin
Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.