Coin Center Asserts Stablecoin Bill Threatens Free Speech Rights

Crypto advocacy group Center challenges the Lummis-Gillibrand Act, citing First Amendment concerns over stablecoin regulation.
By Maxwell Mutuma
Just In: Senator Bill Hagerty Introduces Bill to Regulate Stablecoins in the US

Highlights

  • Coin Center opposes the Lummis-Gillibrand Payment Stablecoin Act, labeling it a potential infringement on constitutional rights.
  • The proposed bill seeks to regulate the payment of stablecoins and ban algorithmic stablecoins, which the Coin Center claims violate the First Amendment.
  • Jerry Brito, Director of Coin Center, sees regulatory efforts as a chance to nurture innovation within a clearly defined legislative framework.

The digital currency advocacy group Coin Center has strongly opposed the Lummis-Gillibrand Payment Stablecoin Act, saying it ‘would impermissibly infringe upon constitutional rights.’ The bipartisan bill, which has the support of Senators Kirsten Gillibrand and Cynthia Lummis, is meant to regulate the payment of stablecoins. The lobbying group Coin Center claims the bill’s prohibition on algorithmic stablecoins would be a violation of the First Amendment by targeting the code comprising digital assets.

The Director of Coin Center, Jerry Brito, welcomed the decision to regulate stablecoins. He noted the fact that there are opportunities for the development of innovation within a clear legislative framework. The bill requires the issuance of a dollar stablecoin only by issuaries adopted in the United States. Coin Center interprets the bill as an opportunity to register with the SEC for issuers of stablecoins, rather than as a ban.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Coin Center Critiques Senate’s Stablecoin Regulation Approach

Recent legislative attempts have sought to establish precise standards for the workability of stablecoins. This decision is based on TerraUSD‘s failure to maintain a fixed exchange rate with the dollar. This event triggered a significant downturn in the cryptocurrency market in 2022. In addition, it led to the declaration of bankruptcies and more investigations from a U.S. regulatory body and even local law enforcement. Coin Center clarified how the Senate reform proposal differed from another submitted in the House.

This Stablecoins Act, which the House is voting on, presents another approach. A moratorium for algorithmic stablecoins for a two-year term should be considered instead of a blanket ban. Coin Center believes this approach to be a more attainable goal and reflects the desire for progress. This move is opposite to the more restrictive Senate proposals, which shows that crypto oversight is still under discussion here.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Uncertainty Surrounds House Stablecoin Act Vote

Coin Center has proposed flexible registration for crypto with the goal of ensuring development while maintaining compliance with rules. According to that view, the pre-existing securities regulatory framework is sufficient to deal with the risks that might arise from stablecoins. Coin Center advocates for incorporating new products under existing regulations. This way, the innovation will prosper while consumer protection and market integrity remain intact.

Senator Sherrod Brown, Chair of the Senate Banking Committee, has also expressed interest in advancing a stablecoin bill. He stated that addressing his concerns would be crucial for moving forward. However, there are currently no plans to schedule the House’s Clarity for Payment Stablecoins Act for a floor vote. This uncertainty adds to the complexity of establishing a coherent regulatory environment for stablecoins in the U.S.

Read Also: Grayscale Bitcoin ETF Faces $1.6B Outflows as Bitcoin Halving Nears

Advertisement
Maxwell Mutuma
Maxwell is a crypto-economic analyst and Blockchain enthusiast, passionate about helping people understand the potential of decentralized technology. I write extensively on topics such as blockchain, cryptocurrency, tokens, and more for many publications. My goal is to spread knowledge about this revolutionary technology and its implications for economic freedom and social good.
Why trust CoinGape: CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights to our readers. Our journalists and analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.
Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.