Coinbase-backed Crypto Mixer Tornado Cash Loses Lawsuit Over US Sanctions

The Judge has denied to lift US sanctions on Tornado Cash by drawing an analogy of its smart contracts with vending machines.
By Bhushan Akolkar
An image to represent the Tornado cash case

On Thursday, August 17, a federal judge denied a motion from crypto participants and giants like Coinbase which stated that the US Treasury was overboard in sanctioning the crypto mixing service provider Tornado Cash.

Judge Robert Pitman of the US District Court for the Western District of Texas has denied the requests for summary judgment from six individuals, including two Coinbase employees, alleging that the Treasury exceeded its authority in attempting to prevent financial transactions that benefit foreign terrorists.

The plaintiffs who filed the lawsuit, supported by Coinbase, claimed that the actions of the department affected innocent Americans who were using the private service for legal purposes. However, the judge chose to agree with the US Treasury’s decisions.

Tornado Cash Vs US Treasury

One year ago, the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) accused crypto mixer Tornado Cash of being involved in laundering over $7 billion worth of cryptocurrencies since its establishment in 2019. In response, the agency imposed sanctions on cryptocurrency wallets connected to Tornado Cash, as well as on related codes referred to as smart contracts.

Earlier in 2023, digital asset research company Chainalysis reported that it had connected almost $2 billion of cryptocurrency stolen in 2022 to North Korean hacking collectives. Furthermore, Chainalysis stated that these groups heavily depended on Tornado Cash for laundering the stolen funds.

In the recent ruling, the judge compared smart contracts with vending machines. The judge wrote: “This reinforces the Court’s point. Vending machines are examples of unilateral contracts. And like vending machines, a smart contract is a tool that carries out a particular, predetermined task. The fact that smart contracts do so without additional human intervention, like a vending machine, or that they are immutable, does not affect its status as type of contract and, thus, a type of property within the meaning of the regulation.”

Advertisement
Bhushan Akolkar
Bhushan is a seasoned crypto writer with over eight years of experience spanning more than 10,000 contributions across multiple platforms like CoinGape, CoinSpeaker, Bitcoinist, Crypto News Flash, and others. Being a Fintech enthusiast, he loves reporting across Crypto, Blockchain, DeFi, Global Macros with a keen understanding in financial markets. 

He is committed to continuous learning and stays motivated by sharing the knowledge he acquires. In his free time, Bhushan enjoys reading thriller fiction novels and occasionally explores his culinary skills. Bhushan has a bachelors degree in electronics engineering, however, his interest in finance and economics drives him to crypto and blockchain.
Why trust CoinGape: CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights to our readers. Our journalists and analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.
Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.