Coinbase Cites Binance Ruling In Request for Interlocutory Appeal in SEC Lawsuit
Highlights
- Coinbase has questioned how regulatory rules can differ so greatly between two judges overseeing similar cases for different exchanges.
- Paul Grewal slammed the judicial system for having inconsistent rules for crypto market participants.
- While demanding regulatory clarity Grewal stated that liability should not depend on the court or judge assigned to the case.
In a recent development, crypto exchange Coinbase has filed a notice requesting an interlocutory appeal, referencing Judge Jackson’s decision in the Binance BNB case. Last week, Judge Jackson ruled that Binance’s BNB token sale in secondary markets does not qualify as securities. Consequently, Coinbase is questioning how two different judges can interpret regulatory rules differently for two exchanges.
Coinbase CLO Raises Question on District Court Judgments
Coinbase Chief Legal Officer Paul Grewal highlighted a significant discrepancy in the judicial treatment of crypto transactions in the United States. Grewal said that two learned district courts analyzing “economically identical transactions” of the two biggest US exchanges have 180-degree diametrically opposite conclusions on whether the transactions qualify as securities transactions.
He also slammed the SEC’s litigation-focused approach toward crypto regulations adding that there are inconsistent rules for market participants across different jurisdictions. “The result of the SEC’s litigation-focused approach to crypto regulation is that market participants now face different rules, not only in different courts in this District but in different federal courts around the country,” noted Grewal.
While emphasizing the uniformity in the legal standards, Grewal stated that Liability shouldn’t depend on the court suing the exchange or the judge being assigned the case.
Liability shouldn’t depending on what what court you get sued in or what judge is assigned to your case. Earlier today we filed a notice in our enforcement case against @SECGov about Judge Jackson’s decision in the case against Binance. This decision squarely rejected the SEC’s… pic.twitter.com/j41nsvVzDq
— paulgrewal.eth (@iampaulgrewal) July 1, 2024
Also Read: Coinbase Initiates Lawsuit Against SEC, FDIC Over Debanking Crypto Entities
Some Background to the Notice
Earlier this year in April 2024, Coinbase requested Judge Failla to pause the legal proceedings in the SEC lawsuit. The exchange demanded an interlocutory appeal citing “substantial grounds for differences of opinion” on whether the Howey Test shall be applicable to crypto transactions taking place in the secondary market.
Back then, Coinbase cited Judge Torres’s opinion in the Ripple vs. SEC lawsuit that XRP, when traded in the secondary market does not satisfy the Howey Test. Coinbase said that such dueling opinions coming from different district judges make it difficult to know what the actual law is.
In responding to Coinbase’s request, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission said that “no court has followed Ripple” while applying the Howey Test to the secondary market sales.
AlsoRead: ConsenSys Responds to SEC Lawsuit Over Metamask
- U.S. Inflation Data: BLS to Release CPI Report on October 24 Amid Government Shutdown
- Bank of America, Citigroup and Goldman Sachs Explore Issuing Stablecoins Pegged to G7 Currencies
- Breaking: Bitcoin Falls After Trump Threatens ‘Massive’ Increase in Tariffs on China
- Breaking: $8 Trillion Morgan Stanley Opens Bitcoin Investments to All Wealth Clients
- Bitget Strengthens On-Chain Rewards Push With Early Hunter Airdrop Launch
- Can $TAPZI Reach $1 In Q1 2026?
- Here’s Why XRP Price May Have a Zcash-Like Surge
- $TAPZI Price Prediction: What’s Ahead of the $TAPZI token Presale?
- Cardano Price Targets $2 as Hydra 1.0 Ignites New Era of Speed and Adoption
- Dogecoin Price Prediction as $23M Leaves Exchanges—Is the Parabolic Phase Beginning?
- Pi Network Price Collapses as Analyst Proposes Turnaround Tweaks
Why Trust CoinGape
CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights Read more…to our readers. Our journal analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.
