After Coinbase This Crypto Lender is Facing Regulatory Scrutiny in 3 US States

Coinbase Inc., one of the leading crypto exchanges in the US recently revealed that the Securities and Exchange Commission has threatened it with a lawsuit over an unreleased stablecoin lending service, which according to SEC qualifies as a security. The exchange claimed SEC had offered no clarity on what makes these lending products security despite them trying to communicate with them for over 6-months. Now another crypto lending service has joined the ranks that might face the wrath of regulators.

According to a filing on September 16, the Securities office of Alabama issued a show-cause notice to Celsius, a popular crypto lending platform asking them to clarify why their offerings don’t violate states security laws. The recent show-cause notice precedes action taken by two other states namely Texas and New Jersey.

As per the notice,

“The investment programs, identified as Celsius Earn Reward, constitute the solicitation of an investment of money; from which an investment return is expected; with such investment return based on the managerial efforts of [Celsius]. The solicited investments, identified as the Celsius “Earn Rewards program”, are “investment contrast” and are securities under the Securities Act.”

The Alabama office has sought answers to the crypto lending platform as to why its products are not registered under the State’s Securities Act.

US Set for a Regulatory Showdown

The debate around Security regulations in the US has hit a peak owing to the ongoing XRP security lawsuit along with the recent regulatory warnings to two other crypto lending platforms. Many US lawmakers themselves have claimed that the existing security laws are not clear enough to govern the crypto market and have sought better clarity from the Security regulator SEC.

While Coinbase and the majority of the crypto proponents believe SEC is trying to protect banks that offer minimal interest rates on their lending and the crypto lending services could prove to be a threat for their business. On the other hand, SEC refuses to offer clarity on what qualifies as a security. The ongoing outrage against SEC’s policies could trigger a regulatory showdown in the US.