Coinbase Fails to Secure Crypto-Specific Regulations from SEC

SEC denies Coinbase's petition for crypto-specific regulations, affirming the role of current securities laws in the crypto sector.
By Maxwell Mutuma
Coinbase Vs SEC: Agency Doubles Down On Denying Exchange's Rulemaking Petition

In a significant development for the cryptocurrency industry, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has formally rejected a petition from Coinbase, a leading cryptocurrency exchange. The petition, aimed at encouraging the SEC to establish a system of rules specifically tailored for digital assets, was turned down on Friday, with the SEC affirming its stance on the applicability of existing securities laws to the crypto sector.

Advertisement
Advertisement

SEC Upholds Current Securities Framework

In a statement accompanying the decision, SEC Chair Gary Gensler emphasized the suitability of the current securities regime for governing crypto asset securities. He argued that the existing laws provide sufficient authority to regulate the industry. Gensler highlighted the SEC’s ongoing efforts in rule proposals to regulate crypto businesses directly and noted the enforcement division’s role in addressing wrongdoing in the sector.

Furthermore, Gensler stressed the importance of maintaining the commission’s discretion in setting its rulemaking priorities. This assertion points to the SEC’s preference for a flexible approach in dealing with the rapidly evolving nature of the crypto market.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Coinbase’s Push for Change and the SEC’s Response

The rejected petition from Coinbase had been a formal pressure tactic employed by the company since 2022 before it faced legal challenges from the SEC as an unregistered securities exchange. Earlier this year, Coinbase had sought a federal court’s intervention to elicit a response from the SEC, which has now been provided.

The SEC’s two-page response concluded that the petitioned rulemaking was currently unwarranted and was not unanimous. Commissioners Hester Peirce and Mark Uyeda opposed the denial, hoping that the industry would continue proposing specific rule changes, guidance, and exemptions. They emphasized the importance of ongoing dialogues for the crypto industry’s development within the U.S.

The SEC’s decision comes against broader efforts by crypto lobbyists in Washington to establish a more defined regulatory framework for the industry. While legislative attempts this year have shown progress, they have not reached fruition. The SEC’s stance indicates a reluctance to adopt industry-specific rules on the securities side.

At the same time, the Financial Stability Oversight Council, which includes the SEC chairman as a member, acknowledged in its annual report the need for Congress to step in with regulations for the crypto sector. This recognition suggests a growing awareness at the federal level of the unique challenges and opportunities presented by digital assets.

The SEC’s decision to uphold the existing securities framework for crypto assets clearly indicates its approach to regulation in this dynamic sector. While the industry continues to evolve, the SEC’s stance, highlights the importance of navigating the existing legal landscape even as calls for tailored regulations grow louder.

Read Also: Brazil Passes Law to Tax Overseas Crypto Holdings in 2024

Advertisement
Maxwell Mutuma
Maxwell is a crypto-economic analyst and Blockchain enthusiast, passionate about helping people understand the potential of decentralized technology. I write extensively on topics such as blockchain, cryptocurrency, tokens, and more for many publications. My goal is to spread knowledge about this revolutionary technology and its implications for economic freedom and social good.
Why trust CoinGape: CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights to our readers. Our journalists and analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.
Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.