Coinbase Vs SEC: CLO Demands Relief From Court Citing SEC Refusal To Produce Full Records

Coinbase Vs SEC: Crypto exchange seeks court relief, citing SEC's refusal to produce full records, which it claims to be hindering fairness in the ongoing lawsuit.
By Rupam Roy
Coinbase CLO Paul Grewal Calls Out FDIC Over Incomplete FOIA Responses

Highlights

  • Coinbase filed a motion seeking relief from the court due to the SEC's refusal to produce records.
  • The US SEC withholds documents, including Gary Gensler's emails, which Coinbase claims to be crucial for the case.
  • The crypto exchange challenges the SEC's broad definition of "exchange" to include Decentralized Exchanges (DEXs).

In the latest development on the Coinbase Vs SEC lawsuit, the crypto exchange has filed a motion demanding relief from the court. CLO Paul Grewal cited the SEC’s refusal to produce full records as a major obstacle in the ongoing legal battle with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. The exchange claims that the inconsistent regulatory approach towards digital assets and the SEC’s refusal to release essential documents, including emails of Gary Gensler, are impacting the fairness of the case.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Coinbase Vs SEC Case: Exchange Urges Court Relief

The latest filing in Coinbase Vs SEC battle comes as a response to what it believes to be the US SEC’s unfair and “inconsistent” regulatory tactics. The exchange argues that the agency is deliberately refusing to provide the documents that are crucial for the case.

Notably, the crucial documents include communications from SEC Commissioners and staff outside the Enforcement Division, particularly those involved with the digital asset regulations. The crypto exchange claims that these documents are crucial to understanding the SEC’s stance on digital assets and how they apply securities laws to them.

In addition, the crypto giant also challenges the regulatory reluctance to search for specific custodians who might have relevant information. Despite the initial refusal from the US SEC, Coinbase provided evidence that these documents exist and are crucial to the case.

On the other hand, the agency’s refusal to log and review non-enforcement documents has further fueled the exchange’s frustration. The exchange argues that it is a violation of the previous court order. In addition, it argues that without access to these documents, the exchange cannot challenge the SEC’s privilege assertions or mount a fair defense.

Advertisement
Advertisement

US SEC’s Defense Stance

In an August 5 filing, the US SEC continued defending its decision to hold back certain documents, arguing that the exchange’s discovery requests are overly broad and irrelevant to the case. In addition, it also accused the crypto giant of engaging in a “fishing expedition” and has cited Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(1) to support its stance. The agency further claims that the requested documents do not meet the relevance and proportionality criteria required by the rule.

The SEC also took issue with the exchange’s fair notice defense, which argues that the crypto regulations lack clarity. The agency has dismissed this defense as insufficient to justify the exchange’s sweeping discovery requests. Besides, the regulatory body refused to examine SEC Chair Gary Gensler’s personal emails for relevant communications, despite the exchange’s insistence that these records could provide crucial insights.

Meanwhile, as the Coinbase Vs SEC battle intensifies, the exchange has also challenged a recent SEC proposal to broaden the definition of “exchange” to include Decentralized Exchanges (DEXs). Grewal, in a recent X post, criticized the proposal, arguing that it lacked critical analysis and would have severe consequences for the crypto industry.

With both sides entrenched in their positions, the Coinbase vs. SEC lawsuit has gained notable traction lately. With the latest conclusion in the Ripple Vs SEC lawsuit, the market is now keeping a close watch on this legal battle, which may have a significant impact on the US crypto regulation.

Advertisement
Rupam Roy
Rupam is a seasoned professional with three years of experience in the financial market, where he has developed a reputation as a meticulous research analyst and insightful journalist. He thrives on exploring the dynamic nuances of the financial landscape. Currently serving as a sub-editor at Coingape, Rupam's expertise extends beyond conventional boundaries. His role involves breaking stories, analyzing AI-related developments, providing real-time updates on the crypto market, and presenting insightful economic news. Rupam's career is characterized by a deep passion for unraveling the complexities of finance and delivering impactful stories that resonate with a diverse audience.
Why trust CoinGape: CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights to our readers. Our journalists and analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.
Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.