Court Grants Consensys Request For Expedited Hearing Against The SEC

A Texas court has granted Consensys request to hear the merits of its case against the SEC on an expedited basis.
By David Pokima
Crypto Scores Big Win As US SEC Suffers Loss In "Dealer" Lawsuit

Highlights

  • Consensys case against the SEC will be heard on an expedited basis.
  • This might see the final ruling end of the year or early 2025.
  • The SEC attempts to regulate Consensys as a securities broker.

A United States Court has granted Consensys request for an expedited hearing in its case against the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). This has pushed the timeline closer in a bid to get more regulatory clarity in the cryptocurrency market. Consensys filed a lawsuit against the SEC in April following a Wells Notice by the regulator to classify Ether as a security. 

Advertisement
Advertisement

Consensys V SEC Expedited

In a recent court ruling, the case filed by the blockchain software company against the U.S. regulator will see its merit heard on an expedited basis. Bill Hughes, Consensys legal rep wrote on X (formerly Twitter) that Judge O’Connor’s request to grant the application will deal with issues taking the time of ruling closer.

Judge O’Connor granted our request that he consider the merits of our case on an expedited basis:  whether the SEC has Congressional authority to regulate MetaMask as a securities broker and issuer.  Those questions would be considered alongside any arguments the SEC would make that we don’t get to bring a case against them.” 

According to the ruling, the timeline of events will see the SEC file a defendant’s answer before July 29 while initial discovery will be completed on August 16. At the end of events is the reply brief to be filed on Nov 26 with other court filings within this period. This brings the timeline of the final ruling to the end of the year or early 2025. In the meantime, crypto users have hailed the decision to bring more clarity to the powers of authorities. 

Advertisement
Advertisement

SEC Seeks To Regulate MetaMask 

As noted, the court will decide whether the SEC has powers to regulate MetaMask as a broker-dealer. Last week, the Commission sued Consensys, MetaMask’s parent company for allegedly operating as an unregistered broker among other related issues. According to the complaint, Consensys has taken over $250 in fees without proper regulations. In April the company sued the SEC over potential attempts to categorize ETH as a security. 

Also Read: Worldcoin Project Contributor Onboards Former Apple, Google & X Employees

Advertisement
David Pokima
David is a finance news contributor with 4 years of experience in Blockchain Technology and Cryptocurrencies. He is interested in learning about emerging technologies and has an eye for breaking news. Staying updated with trends, David reported in several niches including regulation, partnerships, crypto assets, stocks, NFTs, etc. Away from the financial markets, David goes cycling and horse riding.
Why trust CoinGape: CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights to our readers. Our journalists and analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.
Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.