Automate
Trades Maximize
Profits

Crypto ETF Issuer Bitwise Defends Michael Saylor’s Strategy, Urges MSCI Neutrality on DATs’ Inclusion

Boluwatife Adeyemi
2 hours ago
Boluwatife Adeyemi is a well-experienced crypto news writer and editor with a focus on macro topics, crypto policy and regulation and the intersection between DeFi and TradFi. He has a knack for simplifying the most technical concepts and making them easy for crypto newbies to understand. Boluwatife is also a lawyer, who holds a law degree from the University of Ibadan. He also holds a certification in Digital Marketing. Away from writing, he is an avid basketball lover, a traveler, and a part-time degen.
Read full bio
Why Trust CoinGape
CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights to our readers. Our journal analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.
An image of Michael Saylor and the Strategy and Bitwise logo

Highlights

  • Bitwise stated that MSCI's proposed rule risks inserting a subjective criteria into what is meant to be an objective process.
  • The crypto ETF issuer also highlighted the value that Strategy provides its shareholders.
  • The firm stated that MSCI's proposed exclusion of DATs puts investors at a disadvantage by removing their crypto exposure.

Crypto ETF issuer Bitwise has released a statement in support of digital asset treasuries (DATs), including Michael Saylor’s Strategy. The firm highlighted how the MSCI’s proposed exclusion of DATs makes the rule-based process more subjective and also puts investors at a disadvantage.

Bitwise Defends Strategy Over Proposed MSCI Exclusion Of DATs

In an X post, Bitwise expressed its disappointment with the MSCI’s proposed exclusion of Saylor’s company from its global indexes. The crypto ETF issuer remarked that the power of a great index lies in its neutrality, as it is meant to serve as “faithful reflections” of the market and not to assess the merits of certain business models, as in this case.

As CoinGape reported, the MSCI is considering a proposal to classify Strategy and other DATs that hold over 50% of their reserves in crypto, which would result in exclusion from MSCI’s indexes. Bitwise noted that, historically, indexes have rightly included companies with concentrated exposure to a single asset.

As such, it warned that the proposed exclusion of DATs risks inserting subjective eligibility criteria into what should be an “objective, rule-based process.” Notably, the proposed rule will apply only to DATs, raising concerns that the index operator is unfairly targeting the crypto industry.

Strategy CEO Phong Le had recently questioned MSCI’s neutrality, noting that companies like Chevron and Newmont, which hold most of their reserves in oil and gold, respectively, aren’t at risk of facing exclusion like DATs.

Why Saylor’s Company Is Not Just A Fund

Bitwise stated that it has firsthand seen the role that Saylor’s company plays in the modern economy. The crypto ETF issuer further opined that the company provides value to its shareholders by operating in ways that Bitcoin ETFs cannot.

Therefore, they are confident in the long-term success of Strategy’s Bitcoin operations. Bitwise also echoed the language in Strategy’s letter to MSCI, describing this level of scrutiny as “arbitrary” because it singles out digital assets and doesn’t apply to other global assets.

The firm claimed that this arbitrary rule disadvantages investors by removing their crypto exposure, especially to the flagship crypto. In line with this, Bitwise urged the MSCI to maintain the high standards that have made its indexes the benchmarks for the world and to allow its indexes to “reflect neutrally and faithfully the next era of financial technology.”

As CoinGape reported, there is currently a petition for the MSCI to withdraw its proposal on excluding DATs from its indexes. The petition has so far garnered 629 signatures in just over a day.

Advertisement
coingape google news

Why Trust CoinGape

CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights Read more… to our readers. Our journal analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.

Newsletter
Your crypto brief.
Delivered every day.
  • Insights that move markets
  • 100,000 active subscribers
By signing-up you agree to our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
About Author
About Author
Boluwatife Adeyemi is a well-experienced crypto news writer and editor with a focus on macro topics, crypto policy and regulation and the intersection between DeFi and TradFi. He has a knack for simplifying the most technical concepts and making them easy for crypto newbies to understand. Boluwatife is also a lawyer, who holds a law degree from the University of Ibadan. He also holds a certification in Digital Marketing. Away from writing, he is an avid basketball lover, a traveler, and a part-time degen.
Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.
Smarter
Trading With
Bots
Cross