Democrats Weigh Support For House Republican Crypto Bill, Here’s Why
Highlights
- House Democratic leaders, including Maxine Waters and David Scott, express reservations but do not actively oppose the GOP's crypto legislation.
- The proposed bill challenges traditional regulatory norms by redefining digital assets and weakening investor protections.
- Democratic concerns persist, with ongoing discussions and efforts to address regulatory implications through engagement with SEC officials.
House Democratic leaders unveiled their position on the House Republican crypto bill, revealing an unexpected strategy. Although Representatives Maxine Waters and David Scott voiced staunch opposition to the bill, they opted not to actively rally fellow lawmakers to vote against it. This move lays the groundwork for forthcoming parliamentary deliberations and voting scheduled for Wednesday, highlighting a crucial juncture in the legislative journey.
Impact of the Proposed Crypto Bill on Regulatory Norms
Traditionally, digital assets have fallen under the regulatory purview of the SEC as securities, assessed through the “Howey” test. This test defines an “investment contract” as an investment of money in a common enterprise with a reasonable expectation of profits. However, the newly proposed bill introduces language that challenges this precedent.
By categorizing digital assets sold as “investment contracts” as non-securities, the bill disrupts established legal norms, casting uncertainty over the traditional securities market. Furthermore, the bill establishes a process allowing digital commodities to be traded in secondary markets if they were initially offered as part of investment contract securities. This provision, along with the creation of a safe harbor for entities filing an “intent to register,” weakens investor protections and exposes markets to potential fraud and manipulation.
Also Read: Spot Ethereum ETF: SEC Pushes Exchanges for Update on 19b-4 Filings
Democratic Concerns and Ongoing Actions Regarding Cryptocurrency Regulation
Despite refraining from actively rallying against the bill, the sentiment among Democratic leaders remains skeptical. A whip question circulated among members emphasized Waters and Scott’s strong opposition without explicitly urging a “no” vote. Waters plans to meet with SEC officials to further discuss concerns, indicating ongoing efforts to address regulatory implications.
In a letter to colleagues, Waters and Scott cautioned against the potential consequences of relaxed regulation under the CFTC, highlighting the risk of lacking a primary regulator in certain areas. This proactive engagement underscores the Democrats’ commitment to ensuring robust oversight and protection within the evolving landscape of cryptocurrency regulation.
Also Read: Shibarium BONE Token Set for Potential Binance Listing Price Up by 5%
- Breaking: USDC Issuer Circle Explores Native Token for Arc Network
- Why Are Top Altcoins ADA, SOL, and ETH Down Today?
- Visa Begins Pilot Program For Direct USDC Payments For U.S. Businesses
- U.S. Government Shutdown Set to End as House Panel Approves Senate Funding Deal
- Analysts Eye FUNToken’s Giveaway as the Push It Needed to Break Out
- When Will Solana Price Reach $300: Prediction and Analysis
- Chainlink Price Targets $20 After Bitwise ETF Gets DTCC Approval
- Ethereum Price Outlook as Whales and Institutions Boost Holdings — Can ETH Reclaim $4K Before Year-End?
- Can Dogecoin Price Hold Above $0.17 Amid Weekly Surge?
- Chainlink Price Could Crash as 3 Risky Patterns Form Amid Whale Selling
- Cardano Price Could Reclaim $0.7 After Key Stakeholders Add $204M in ADA




