EigenLayer Airdrop Faces Backlash Over Token Lockup

EigenLayer's airdrop details 45% of 1.67B tokens to users, sparking debates over non-transferability and regulatory exclusions.
By Maxwell Mutuma
Ethereum Researcher Justin Drake Quits EigenLayer Advisory Role

Highlights

  • EigenLayer airdrop allocates 45% of 1.67 billion tokens to the community.
  • Tokens are non-transferable for months post-launch to aid decentralization.
  • Post-announcement, 150,000 ETH were withdrawn, impacting Ethereum's stability.

The unveiling of the EigenLayer airdrop details has ignited a mix of applause and intense scrutiny. The plan outlines a distribution of 45% of 1.67 billion tokens to the community. This includes an initial season airdrop of 5%, targeting protocol stakeholders. Yet, restrictions on token transferability have sparked widespread concern and debate.

EigenLayer has stated that upon launch, tokens will be non-transferable for several months. This measure aims to promote decentralization and foster consensus on the token’s utility and governance. Despite these intentions, the move has led to significant dissatisfaction among airdrop recipients.

Critics argue that these restrictions may limit the immediate utility of the tokens. Additionally, comparisons have been drawn to the Starknet airdrop earlier this year, which encountered similar controversies regarding token lockup and release schedules.

Advertisement
Advertisement

EigenLayer Airdrop Strategy Sparks Widespread Discontent

EigenLayer’s allocation strategy further complicates the reception of the airdrop. David Hoffman, Co-Owner of Bankless, has defended the plan on social media platform X. He noted that the 15% total supply earmarked for community airdrops is 50% higher than the industry standard. Yet, dissatisfaction remains among those anticipating more flexible access to their tokens.

The exclusion of certain countries, notably the U.S. and Canada, along with blocks on VPN users, has intensified frustrations. These measures, intended to comply with regulatory frameworks, have nonetheless led to accusations of inconsistency in platform access versus airdrop participation.

Additionally, the airdrop’s complex structure and concepts, like intersubjective forking, have led to confusion and debate among potential recipients. This has been especially pronounced among Pendle users, who were initially thought to be excluded.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Airdrop Policies Cause Ethereum Market Turbulence

The market response to the airdrop and surrounding controversies has been palpable. Following the announcement, Pendle’s market value saw an 11.8% decline. Moreover, the broader Ethereum network on which EigenLayer operates has experienced significant turbulence.

Reports from Dune Analytics and DefiLlama indicate a surge in Ethereum withdrawals. Approximately 150,000 ETH, valued at around $457 million, have been withdrawn. This mass exodus highlights the broader market’s reaction to the airdrop’s policies and the potential implications for Ethereum’s stability.

While EigenLayer’s airdrop aims to enrich community engagement through substantial token distribution, the accompanying restrictions and exclusions have stirred significant debate and dissatisfaction.

Read Also: North Korean Group Lazarus Strikes Again With $200 Mln Crypto Laundering Case

Advertisement
Maxwell Mutuma
Maxwell is a crypto-economic analyst and Blockchain enthusiast, passionate about helping people understand the potential of decentralized technology. I write extensively on topics such as blockchain, cryptocurrency, tokens, and more for many publications. My goal is to spread knowledge about this revolutionary technology and its implications for economic freedom and social good.
Why trust CoinGape: CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights to our readers. Our journalists and analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.
Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.