Elon Musk Dragged Into Fresh $6B Lawsuit Post-OpenAI Brawl

Godfrey Benjamin
March 3, 2024
Why Trust CoinGape
CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights to our readers. Our journal analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.
Elon Musk Spotlights Google & OpenAI Bias On Trump Vs Harris Saga

Highlights

  • Elon Musk is now embroiled in a new lawsuit worth $6 billion
  • In this lawsuit, some Tesla lawyers are demanding massive shares
  • This lawsuit is one of the many confronting Elon Musk at this time

After initially pushing that Elon Musk‘s $55.8 billion pay package be thrown out, the same lawyers for a Tesla Inc. investor Richard Tornetta, are asking for Tesla shares.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Elon Musk and the New Lawsuit: the Demand

Precisely, on Friday these lawyers requested that their legal fees be paid in the form of about $6 billion of stock in the electric-car maker.

Concerning the current market value of Tesla shares, their request is worth an hourly rate of $288,888. These lawyers are from three firms; Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann Friedman Oster & Tejtel, both based in New York, and Andrews & Springer of Wilmington.

They had previously contested Musk’s pay package when he was sued by Tornetta in 2018, claiming that it is quite excessive. 

According to the three firms’ Friday filing with the court of chancery in Delaware, they tried to explain why they deserve stock rather than cash. “We recognise that the requested fee is unprecedented in terms of absolute size.”

“This structure has the benefit of linking the award directly to the benefit created and avoids taking even one cent from the Tesla balance sheet to pay fees. It is also tax-deductible by Tesla,” the lawyers added in the filing.

Noteworthy, these lawyers are making this request of the electric car maker because Tesla benefitted from the return of Musk’s pay package. The legal team is very positive that the pay package will result in the return of up to 266 million shares to the carmaker.

Meanwhile, Musk has other pending lawsuits with Sam Altman and his Artificial Intelligence (AI) OpenAI. He is suing the AI company for a breach of agreement amid concerns about profit-driven AI development. For context, the lawsuit claims that OpenAI has drifted towards commercial interests, particularly with tech giant Microsoft. This contradicts its original mission of developing AI for the benefit of humanity.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Largest Award In Corporate History

Agreeing to a settlement in a lawsuit has never been a challenge for Musk, as was seen in the case of a lawsuit by former Twitter employees who claimed that they didn’t receive severance pay during a mass layoff. However, he feels that Tornetta’s lawyers are asking for too much.

After the filing was made, the Tesla boss took to X to respond to the bold request of the lawyers. In his opinion, these legal representatives did nothing other than damage Tesla. He referred to them as “criminals” for wanting to receive shares in the company. Ann Lipton, a corporate law professor at Tulane University, shared her stance on the filing.

“Now, to be fair, the case involved the largest compensation award ever to an executive,” she said, highlighting how substantial the claim is.

In the meantime, the request for $6 million worth of Tesla shares is subject to approval by Judge Kathaleen McCormick, who had previously referred to Musk’s pay package as unfathomable.

Advertisement
coingape google news coingape google news
Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.

Why Trust CoinGape

CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights Read more…to our readers. Our journal analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.

About Author
About Author
Benjamin Godfrey is a blockchain enthusiast and journalists who relish writing about the real life applications of blockchain technology and innovations to drive general acceptance and worldwide integration of the emerging technology. His desires to educate people about cryptocurrencies inspires his contributions to renowned blockchain based media and sites. Benjamin Godfrey is a lover of sports and agriculture. Follow him on X, Linkedin
Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.