Elon Musk Escalates Fight With OpenAI & Microsoft With Revised Lawsuit

Elon Musk escalates his fight with OpenAI and Microsoft, filing a revised lawsuit accusing them of monopolistic practices and anti-competitive collaboration in the generative AI sector.
By Rupam Roy
Elon Musk Slams Sam Altman Amid OpenAI's For-Profit Move & Anti-Trump Funding

Highlights

  • Elon Musk files a revised lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft for monopolistic practices.
  • Musk claims OpenAI betrayed its nonprofit mission by prioritizing commercial interests.
  • The lawsuit alleges OpenAI and Microsoft control nearly 70% of the generative AI market.

Billionaire entrepreneur Elon Musk has intensified his battle against OpenAI and Microsoft by filing a revised lawsuit on November 14. The legal move accuses the tech giants of monopolistic practices in the generative AI sector. Musk’s company, xAI, and Shivon Zilis, a Neuralink executive and former OpenAI board member, are among the plaintiffs challenging the alleged anticompetitive collaboration.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Elon Musk Revises Lawsuit Against OpenAI & Microsoft

The amended lawsuit filed by Elon Musk on November 14 claims that OpenAI and Microsoft have formed a “de facto merger,” leveraging their combined dominance to stifle competition in the AI industry. The complaint accuses the companies of recruiting AI talent through extravagant salaries, reportedly spending $1.5 billion for a workforce of 1,500.

Notably, reports indicate some OpenAI engineers earn up to $800,000 annually, including bonuses and stock options. Besides, the lawsuit also alleges that OpenAI discouraged investors from funding rival AI companies during a recent $6.6 billion fundraising round.

Previously, several reports claimed that this stipulation aimed to block competitors, including Musk’s xAI, from securing critical investments. Despite these claims, SoftBank, which contributed $500 million to OpenAI’s funding round, has stated it retains the freedom to back other AI ventures.

Meanwhile, lawyers for Musk argue the partnership between Microsoft and OpenAI creates a monopolistic environment, with the duo controlling nearly 70% of the generative AI market. The complaint suggests Microsoft has embedded itself deeply within OpenAI operations, blurring the lines between the two entities.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Escalating Rivalry With OpenAI

The amended lawsuit builds upon a series of disputes between Elon Musk and OpenAI. In March, Musk filed an initial suit against the AI firm and its founders, Sam Altman and Greg Brockman, accusing them of abandoning their nonprofit mission. Musk later withdrew the lawsuit without explanation but reignited the legal battle in August.

The new lawsuit also highlights OpenAI’s shift to a for-profit model, which Musk claims betrays its original mission to advance AI for the benefit of humanity. Musk, who co-founded OpenAI in 2015, has alleged he was misled into supporting the organization, which now prioritizes commercial interests over ethical development.

Notably, this report comes as Sam Altman’s OpenAI is gearing up to launch a new artificial intelligence tool named Operator. Besides, the AI firm has also pulled funding of $6.6 billion recently, which puts its valuation at $157 billion.

Advertisement
Rupam Roy
Rupam is a seasoned professional with three years of experience in the financial market, where he has developed a reputation as a meticulous research analyst and insightful journalist. He thrives on exploring the dynamic nuances of the financial landscape. Currently serving as a sub-editor at Coingape, Rupam's expertise extends beyond conventional boundaries. His role involves breaking stories, analyzing AI-related developments, providing real-time updates on the crypto market, and presenting insightful economic news. Rupam's career is characterized by a deep passion for unraveling the complexities of finance and delivering impactful stories that resonate with a diverse audience.
Why trust CoinGape: CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights to our readers. Our journalists and analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.
Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.