Elon Musk Faces Legal Heat As Judge Probes Into Twitter Stock Manipulation Lawsuit

Coingapestaff
December 12, 2023 Updated May 28, 2025
Why Trust CoinGape
CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights to our readers. Our journal analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.
Elon Musk US inflation Galaxy CEO Mike Novogratz

The tussle between former Twitter investors and Elon Musk embraced a fresh stance recently as a judge ruled out a concrete decision on the matter.

In his recent court chronicle, Elon Musk, founder of X, formerly known as Twitter, appears to be facing a lawsuit following his aggressive strategies to slash the firm’s price value. The lawsuit against Musk comes as a lead-up to finalizing Twitter’s $44 billion acquisition last year.

Ever since the X’s inception within the social media industry, Musk seems to be in an unceasing skirmish with court proceedings. The social media platform recently forged ahead with multiple court filings, orchestrating a wave of frenzy within the industry.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Judge Cracks Down On Musk’s Past Statements

Judge Stephen Breyer, in his recent ruling, emphasized false statements made by Elon Musk concerning a proposed acquisition made earlier. Intriguingly, Musk earlier proclaimed that the acquisition was temporarily delayed due to the need for data supporting a specific condition for the merger. He further portrayed that he had the right to terminate the deal following the delay.

The particular condition encompassed data jacking up the calculation of total spam or fake users on the platform. To this, investors argued that the delay comes as a result of the condition for the merger. However, Musk insisted that his statement was technically true as the deal was genuinely delayed further.

Conversely, Breyer differed, stressing Musk’s assertion that Twitter’s obligation to provide data was false. Moreover, the judge refused to dismiss a claim regarding Musk’s tweet reflecting a higher percentage of fake accounts on the platform. The tweet made it seem like Musk had the authority to inspect things and back out from the merger. Meanwhile, the judge found it misleading on Musk’s part, ruling against him.

Also read: Polygon Unveils Unified Portal For Web3 Interactions, MATIC Price To Rally?

Advertisement
Advertisement

A Brief History

Elon Musk faced a lawsuit last year accusing him of intentionally lowering Twitter’s stock value to renegotiate the acquisition deal. Intriguingly, Twitter’s shares dropped from $71.69 in July to $43.42 in March 2022, influencing Musk to believe he’s getting a bargain. However, his Tesla stock, which came as collateral, also plunged roughly 37% during this period. This prompted a margin call for the $12.5 billion loan Musk took, collateralized by this stock.

Aligning with the afore-stated information, the lawsuit stressed that the statements made by Musk come as untrue as he might have needed to cover a shortage if he got a margin call.

Also read: Here’s Why Crypto Titans Plot Daring Shift To Abu Dhabi

Advertisement
coingape google news coingape google news
Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.

Why Trust CoinGape

CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights Read more…to our readers. Our journal analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.

About Author
About Author
CoinGape comprises an experienced team of native content writers and editors working round the clock to cover news globally and present news as a fact rather than an opinion. CoinGape writers and reporters contributed to this article.
Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.