Ether Commodity Status To Cause SEC Dilemma In Coinbase Battle, XRP Lawyer Says

Coinbase Vs SEC: XRP lawyer raises concerns about the SEC's inconsistent classification of cryptocurrencies, particularly in light of Ethereum's recent designation as a commodity.
By Rupam Roy
Coinbase SEC lawsuit XRP lawyer Ethereum Commodity ripple xrp

Highlights

  • XRP lawyer questions SEC's classification of Ethereum amid ongoing Coinbase legal battle.
  • Insights suggest legal hurdles for the SEC in the ongoing legal battle with Coinbase.
  • Ripple case's potential connection to Ethereum classification remains uncertain.

In the ongoing legal tussle between Coinbase and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), a notable XRP lawyer, MetaLawMan, has raised crucial points that could impact the outcome of the case. His remarks, shared in recent online posts, have ignited discussions surrounding the SEC’s classification of cryptocurrencies, especially with the recent Ethereum’s commodity status.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Ethereum’s Commodity Status Challenges Regulatory Narrative

In a recent X post, MetaLawMan highlights how the SEC would face challenges in defining the regulatory status of cryptocurrencies, particularly in light of its recent acknowledgment that Ethereum (ETH) is a commodity. By highlighting the SEC’s argument regarding crypto tokens operating within an “ecosystem,” he questions the SEC’s inconsistency.

To be precise, he questions the SEC’s different view in classifying Ethereum as a commodity while considering other tokens as securities, when traded on platforms like Coinbase. Notably, the tokens that he mentioned are Solana (SOL) and Cardano (ADA). For context, the SEC has recent given a regulatory nod to the Spot Ethereum ETF in the U.S.

Meanwhile, the lawyer’s observations hint at potential legal hurdles for the SEC, especially as Coinbase prepares to file its Reply Brief and possibly seek a rehearing of its motion to dismiss in light of Ethereum’s commodity designation. This development could have significant implications not only for Coinbase’s case but also for the regulatory framework governing cryptocurrencies as a whole.

In addition, MetaLawMan’s insights also bring attention to Judge Failla’s interpretation of the SEC’s ecosystem argument, which formed the basis of her ruling in the Coinbase case. His analysis suggests that this interpretation could influence future legal proceedings and regulatory decisions within the crypto space.

Also Read: Ethereum Price Risks Of Falling To $3.4K Despite ETF Optimism, Here’s Why

Advertisement
Advertisement

Will Ripple Be Also Benefited From Coinbase?

Despite the implications for Coinbase, the lawyer admits uncertainty regarding how these arguments might impact other crypto-related cases, such as the ongoing lawsuit involving Ripple. While MetaLawMan’s focus has been on the ecosystem issue in the Coinbase case, he acknowledges the complexity of legal arguments and their application across different contexts.

Meanwhile, the Ripple case, which has been closely watched by the cryptocurrency community, remains distinct from the issues raised in the Coinbase lawsuit. While MetaLawMan’s insights offer valuable perspectives on regulatory challenges, particularly regarding Ethereum’s classification, it’s uncertain how these arguments will affect Ripple’s legal battle and its potential appeal to higher courts.

For context, a user recently inquired about the impact of the legal issue on the Ripple case and its chances of being appealed to the high court. In response, the lawyer stated uncertainty, indicating that the particular “ecosystem” issue they focused on wasn’t argued in the Ripple case. This admission suggests a lack of clarity regarding the direct relevance of the legal matter to Ripple’s ongoing legal proceedings and the potential for it to reach the high court.

Meanwhile, the broader landscape of crypto regulation continues to evolve, with regulatory agencies grappling to adapt existing laws to the unique characteristics of digital assets. Coinbase’s recent request for a new regulatory framework underscores the industry’s need for clearer guidelines to navigate the regulatory landscape effectively.

Also Read: Blast Blockchain Secures Sixth Spot In DeFi Network Rankings

Advertisement
Rupam Roy
Rupam is a seasoned professional with three years of experience in the financial market, where he has developed a reputation as a meticulous research analyst and insightful journalist. He thrives on exploring the dynamic nuances of the financial landscape. Currently serving as a sub-editor at Coingape, Rupam's expertise extends beyond conventional boundaries. His role involves breaking stories, analyzing AI-related developments, providing real-time updates on the crypto market, and presenting insightful economic news. Rupam's career is characterized by a deep passion for unraveling the complexities of finance and delivering impactful stories that resonate with a diverse audience.
Why trust CoinGape: CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights to our readers. Our journalists and analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.
Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.