Ethereum ETF Approval Process Labeled Political By Nate Geraci, Here’s All

Coingapestaff
June 17, 2024 Updated May 22, 2025
Why Trust CoinGape
CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights to our readers. Our journal analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.
Spot Ethereum ETF: Here Is The Last Sign To Watch Ahead of Launch

Highlights

  • Nate Geraci, president of The ETF Store, criticizes media for biased reporting on Ethereum ETFs.
  • Geraci highlights political influences in regulatory decisions, contrasting with successful Bitcoin ETF strategies.
  • SEC Chair Gary Gensler suggests a potential approval timeline for Ethereum ETFs, sparking industry speculation.

In a recent development, Nate Geraci, president of The ETF Store, has launched a scathing critique against mainstream media outlets regarding their coverage of the Ethereum (ETH) ETF approval process. Geraci alleges that media reports have been rife with inaccuracies and have failed to provide a clear and unbiased perspective on regulatory decisions surrounding Ethereum ETFs.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Geraci’s Criticism and Advocacy for Clear Reporting

Expressing frustration over what he perceives as a mishandling of the ETF approval coverage, Nate Geraci emphasized a notable shift towards politicization in regulatory decision-making. He pointed to Grayscale’s successful navigation of the regulatory landscape for Bitcoin ETFs as a contrasting example, commending the firm’s strategic approach. Despite any reservations about Grayscale, Geraci highlighted their significant impact on advancing regulatory conversations surrounding both Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs.

Geraci’s critique reflects ongoing debates within the industry regarding the fairness and transparency of regulatory processes for cryptocurrency investments. As he continues to advocate for more accurate and objective reporting, the community remains vigilant for further developments that could shape the future of Ethereum ETFs in the United States.

Also Read: Dogecoin Developer Issues Important Warning To Community

Advertisement
Advertisement

Regulatory Landscape and Future Outlook

Recently, SEC Chair Gary Gensler indicated during a Senate Appropriations Committee Hearing that the approval process for a spot Ethereum ETF S-1 is anticipated to proceed by the summer, sparking varied reactions within the community. This announcement follows the SEC’s approval of spot 19b-4 filings on May 23, which has intensified speculation about the potential listing of an Ethereum ETF.

Gensler clarified that the timeline for approval ultimately hinges on the responsiveness of ETF issuers to regulatory feedback, rather than a strict timeline dictated by the SEC. This statement has further fueled discussions among stakeholders about the regulatory path forward for Ethereum and other digital assets.

Also Read: Ripple CLO Says US SEC Has Abandoned Its Absurd Demand for $2B

Advertisement
coingape google news coingape google news
Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.

Why Trust CoinGape

CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights Read more…to our readers. Our journal analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.

About Author
About Author
CoinGape comprises an experienced team of native content writers and editors working round the clock to cover news globally and present news as a fact rather than an opinion. CoinGape writers and reporters contributed to this article.
Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.