Ethereum ETF: What's The Reason Behind Grayscale Ditching ETH Futures Plan?

Highlights

Grayscale has pulled out from the Ethereum futures ETF application.
Fox Journalist Eleanor Terrett cited potential reasons for the move.
On the flip side, Bloomberg analyst James Seyffart believes that Grayscale's decision was guided by the SEC.

Grayscale Investments has sent shockwaves through the crypto industry by withdrawing its application for the Ethereum Futures ETF. While the investment firm hasn’t opened up on the reason for its decision, the crypto community has weighed in their opinion. Moreover, Fox Journalist Eleanor Terrett has shed light on potential reasons for the withdrawal of Grayscale’s Ethereum Futures ETF.

Why Did Grayscale Withdraw ETH Futures ETF?

Grayscale recently made headlines as they withdrew their 19b-4 filing for an Ethereum futures ETF. Bloomberg ETF Research Analyst, James Seyffart, characterized the filing as a “trojan horse” strategy. Moreover, he suggested that Grayscale aimed to replicate the circumstances that led to the approval of their GBTC Bitcoin ETF.

In addition, Seyffart highlighted that Grayscale could leverage the contradictory nature of SEC decisions. He cited how Grayscale won the lawsuit vy highlighting the SEC’s decision of approving Bitcoin futures-based ETFs while denying Spot Bitcoin ETFs. The analyst added that Grayscale should have sought similar success with an Ethereum futures ETF.

However, the institution played a reverse card and gave up on the opportunity. Seyffart speculated this move to have been influenced by the SEC. He noted that the SEC might have had a meeting with Grayscale executives and convinced them to withdraw the Ethereum futures ETF.

On the other hand, Eleanor Terrett offered another perspective. She noted that Grayscale never completed an S-1 filing for its Ethereum futures ETF. Terrett proposed that the SEC may have been waiting to review a finalized futures application before considering the spot application. Meanwhile, Grayscale could have been awaiting a complete futures application from a competitor.

Since there was no finalized ETH futures ETF application by another party, Grayscale could have pulled the plug on the initiative to save time and resources. Additionally, she pointed out the relatively subdued investor demand for existing Ethereum futures ETFs since their launch last year.

Terrett speculated that Grayscale’s decision to withdraw the ETH futures ETF application could stem from a strategic evaluation of resource allocation. With muted demand for existing ETH futures ETFs and potentially limited prospects for approval, Grayscale may have opted to prioritize other initiatives.

Also Read: Breaking: Grayscale Withdraws Ether Futures ETF 19b-4 Filing

SEC Delays Spot Ethereum ETF Decision

The SEC has continued to delay its decision regarding the Spot Ethereum ETF applications. This could have also fuelled Grayscale’s latest move. The SEC’s recent filing indicates a need for extended examination of the proposed rule change for the Invesco Galaxy Ethereum ETF.

This decision aims to ensure a comprehensive evaluation of the complexities involved before granting approval. Such actions come amidst a backdrop of delays affecting numerous other firms, including Grayscale and BlackRock, which are pursuing similar approvals.

The SEC’s cautious approach reflects the broader regulatory uncertainty surrounding cryptocurrency offerings. While Grayscale’s Ethereum Trust is already registered, challenges persist, as evidenced by the SEC’s recent call for additional public input. These recurring delays underscore the delicate balancing act regulators face in reconciling regulation with the growing demand for crypto investment vehicles.

Also Read: Bitcoin & ETH Records $251M Outflow Last Week, But There’s A Catch

Recommended
Price Analysis

Best Crypto Presales To Invest In September 2025 – Top Upcoming Presale Tokens

Best Crypto AI Trading Bots In 2025

Top Meme Coins To Buy In September 2025

Coingape Staff

CoinGape comprises an experienced team of native content writers and editors working round the clock to cover news globally and present news as a fact rather than an opinion. CoinGape writers and reporters contributed to this article.

Why trust CoinGape: CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights to our readers. Our journalists and analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.

Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.

Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.