FTX CEO Sam Bankman-Fried Accuses Voyager of Slowly Bleeding Customers Frozen Assets

By Bhushan Akolkar
Sam Bankman-Fried FTX SEC probe

A new battle has emerged between troubled crypto lender Voyager Digital and crypto exchange FTX. On Sunday, July 24, Voyager rejected the buyout proposal from FTX calling it a “low-ball bid” as well as ‘misleading and outright false claims’.

FTX chief Sam Bankman-Fried has lashed out at Voyager explaining how the troubled crypto is trying to bleed customers money. Voyager said that it still holds a majority of the customers’ assets to which FTX asked then why haven’t those been returned to customers yet?

As per the FTX chief SBF, Voyager should first return all of the assets to customers and the rest if Three Arrows Capital (3AC) pays back in the future. In kind-off an accusation on Voyager, Bankman-Fried explains the reason saying:

Well, the *traditional* process is that before customers get their assets back, they get fucked. First, there’s a long, drawn out process, during which funds are frozen. It can take years. Remember Mt. Gox? That process is *still going on*.

Meanwhile, that entire time, various bankruptcy agents are slowly bleeding the customer’s frozen assets dry with consulting fees. This can cost customers hundreds of millions of dollars by the time all is said and done.

SBF Explains Customer Is At the Losing End, FTX Solves It

SBF explains that suppose the customer holds 1 BTC with Voyager at around $30K. Also, the bankruptcy proceedings can take years. In this case, customers get either 1 BTC or $30K whichever is lower. Thus, he says that the customer is likely to lose in the long run.

He said that a low of third parties have been trying to bid as low as $0.10 on the Dollars for the assets with Voyager. The FTX chief explains:

If a customer had $100 on the platform, a third party would pay $10 for it, get whatever funds remained (maybe $75), and then the customer… gets back $10.

Voyager’s consultants would be slowly draining the remaining funds by charging fees every month the bankruptcy process dragged on. This didn’t seem right to us. Customers already lost assets; we didn’t want them to lose more.

Lashing out at the Voyager consultants, SBF said that they are willing to drag the bankruptcy proceedings as long as possible. He said that if Voyager would accept FTX’s offer, the customers would get their share of “everything that remained,” as soon as possible.

Advertisement
Bhushan Akolkar
Bhushan is a seasoned crypto writer with over eight years of experience spanning more than 10,000 contributions across multiple platforms like CoinGape, CoinSpeaker, Bitcoinist, Crypto News Flash, and others. Being a Fintech enthusiast, he loves reporting across Crypto, Blockchain, DeFi, Global Macros with a keen understanding in financial markets. 

He is committed to continuous learning and stays motivated by sharing the knowledge he acquires. In his free time, Bhushan enjoys reading thriller fiction novels and occasionally explores his culinary skills. Bhushan has a bachelors degree in electronics engineering, however, his interest in finance and economics drives him to crypto and blockchain.
Why trust CoinGape: CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights to our readers. Our journalists and analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.
Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.