FTX Creditors Demand SBF’s Forfeited Property As Lawyers File Petition, Here’s All

Coingapestaff
June 15, 2024 Updated May 22, 2025
Why Trust CoinGape
CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights to our readers. Our journal analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.
Coinbase CLO Slams US SEC for Stopping FTX On Crypto Repayments

Highlights

  • FTX creditors' lawyers file a petition in Florida for the forfeiture of Sam Bankman-Fried’s forfeited property.
  • Legal arguments emphasize that the assets belong to customers, not the FTX bankruptcy estate.
  • Creditors oppose FTX's reorganization plan, advocating for compensation in cryptocurrency.

The lawyers leading the class action lawsuit for FTX creditors, Adam Moskowitz and David Boies, have taken a major stride in their quest to secure justice for those devastated by the cryptocurrency exchange’s catastrophic collapse. 

They’ve submitted a formal request to Judge Moore in Florida, demanding the seizure of any property tied to Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF), the disgraced founder at the center of FTX’s implosion. This strategic move seeks to recover assets believed to be in SBF’s possession, which could potentially offer some financial relief to the countless creditors left reeling from the aftermath of FTX’s downfall. 

Advertisement
Advertisement

Creditors’ Claims and Legal Arguments

Sunil Kavuri, the FTX creditor representative, has publicly stated that his class action lawyers, Moskowitz and Boies, have filed the petition in Florida to target SBF’s forfeited property. The creditors argue that the MDL lawsuit does not encompass claims that would belong to the bankruptcy estate, emphasizing that the assets in question rightfully belong to the customers, not FTX itself.

According to Kavuri, the Terms of Service are clear, and even FTX insiders have confirmed that these assets should be returned to the plaintiffs. The creditors maintain that their cryptocurrency holdings can be directly traced to SBF’s investments, reinforcing their entitlement to reclaim their property.

Also Read: Australia Spot Bitcoin ETF To Start Trading On ASX Stock Exchange

Advertisement
Advertisement

Opposition to FTX’s Reorganization Plan

The Moskowitz Law Firm and Boies Schiller Flexner LLP, representing thousands of plaintiffs in the multi-district litigation (MDL) against FTX, have objected to the proposed reorganization plan for FTX Trading Ltd. and its affiliates.

They argue that the plan’s recovery figures are misleading and fail to account for the appreciation in cryptocurrency value since the Petition Date, thus not fulfilling Bankruptcy Code 1125’s full disclosure requirements.

Sunil Kavuri, the FTX creditor representative, has also voiced opposition to the proposed compensation plan. He advocates for debts to be settled in cryptocurrency rather than their dollar equivalent at the point of bankruptcy, ensuring that creditors receive fair compensation reflective of current market values.

Also Read: Whale Moves $4.14M In PEPE To Binance Amid Price Dip, What’s Next?

Advertisement
coingape google news coingape google news
Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.

Why Trust CoinGape

CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights Read more…to our readers. Our journal analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.

About Author
About Author
CoinGape comprises an experienced team of native content writers and editors working round the clock to cover news globally and present news as a fact rather than an opinion. CoinGape writers and reporters contributed to this article.
Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.