House Republican’s Pro-Crypto Bill Gets Major Push, Institutional Adoption To Soar?

Rep. Mike Flood's bill against SAB 121 received a major push lately, which could lead to a positive shift in institutional crypto adoption.
By Coingapestaff
Janover Expands Payment Options With Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana

Highlights

  • The SAB 121 rule poses major threat to institutional crypto adoption, according to the U.S. Republicans.
  • Rep. Mike Flood had introduced a bill to revoke SAB 121.
  • The pro-crypto bill has attained a major milestone with House Financial Services Committee's support.

The House Financial Services Committee is making strides in advancing US Rep Mike Flood’s bill to revoke Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) 121 rule this Thursday. This move is pivotal in paving the way for a surge in institutional crypto adoption. Perianne Boring, CEO of the Chamber of Digital Commerce, revealed the the update stating, “Momentum is building in Washington.”

Advertisement
Advertisement

Legal Actions & Statements Against SAB 121

Earlier, Senator Lummis voiced her concerns, stating, “SAB 121 has massive implications, and the SEC should have received feedback on it from the federal banking regulators and the public before implementing this legally binding directive.” She emphasized the necessity of ensuring consumer protection and the ability of well-regulated financial institutions to securely custody Americans’ assets.

Congressmen Mike Flood and Wiley Nickel are taking action by introducing a resolution under the Congressional Review Act, asserting that the rule should have no force or effect. Additionally, they’re spearheading the Uniform Treatment of Custodial Assets Act, which aims to exempt banks from treating custodied assets as liabilities and prevent additional capital requirements for offering custody services for crypto-assets. Senator Cynthia Lummis is a staunch supporter of this crypto bill.

The American Bankers Association expressed its concerns, stating, “The SEC’s Staff Accounting Bulletin 121 represents a significant departure from longstanding accounting treatment for custodied assets and threatens the banking industry’s ability to provide its customers with safe and sound custody of digital assets.”

Limiting banks’ capacity to offer these services poses risks for consumers and diminishes their trusted options for managing digital asset portfolios. Furthermore, various financial institutions including the Bank Policy Institute, Financial Services Forum, and SIFMA stand in solidarity with the legislators’ efforts.

Also Read: USDC Stablecoin Growth with Circle and Coincheck Deal in Japan

Advertisement
Advertisement

How SAB 121 Poses A Threat To Crypto Adoption?

SAB 121 imposes stringent requirements, compelling all listed companies, beyond banks, to disclose crypto-assets under custody as both assets and liabilities on the balance sheet. This accounting approach contradicts the convention that custodied assets do not belong to the company and shouldn’t be reflected on the balance sheet.

For banks, this rule significantly impacts their capital requirements as they must hold capital equivalent to assets under custody, presenting a staggering challenge for compliance. For instance, BNY Mellon would need $48 trillion in capital if the rule were applied universally.

The Basel Committee, responsible for setting bank capital and liquidity standards, does not advocate for this accounting treatment. Even with its rules on crypto-assets, it explicitly stated that such assets shouldn’t be included on balance sheets, albeit with certain risk-related considerations.

Moreover, the banking sector strongly opposes SAB 121. Former State Street Digital head Nadine Chakar described it as ‘insane,’ and State Street Digital underwent restructuring along with staff layoffs shortly after Spot Bitcoin ETF launch.

Moreover, during a Congressional hearing, Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell acknowledged the unconventional nature of SAB 121’s treatment. Earlier, in November 2023, lawmakers urged the Federal Reserve and Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) to disregard SAB 121, underscoring the growing dissent towards its implications.

Also Read: Hong Kong Introduces Rules to Foil Suspicious OTC Crypto Trades

Advertisement
Coingapestaff
CoinGape comprises an experienced team of native content writers and editors working round the clock to cover news globally and present news as a fact rather than an opinion. CoinGape writers and reporters contributed to this article.
Why trust CoinGape: CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights to our readers. Our journalists and analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.
Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.