Is Ethereum Censorship By The OFAC Possible? Here’s What Vitalik Buterin Think

Vitalik Buterin considers enforcing censorship by regulators as attack on Ethereum and voted for burning the ETH stakes of staking providers.
By Varinder Singh
Ethereum Co-founder Vitalik Buterin Crypto-friendly politics

Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin considers enforcing censorship by regulators as an attack on Ethereum. He voted in favor of burning the ETH stakes of staking providers via social consensus if they comply and censor transactions at the Ethereum protocol level with validators.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Vitalik Buterin Strongly Opposes Forced Ethereum Censorship

Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin in a tweet on August 16 revealed that he has voted to “Consider the censorship an attack on Ethereum and burn their stake via social consensus” in a Twitter poll by Eric Wall.

The sanction, or forced censorship, of crypto mixer Tornado Cash by the Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) raises concerns over the potential censorship of Ethereum post-Merge. A Dune dashboard data reveals that over 66% of the Beacon chain validators are likely to comply with the OFAC.

If a majority of staking providers such as Lido, Coinbase, Kraken Exchange, Staked, and Bitcoin Suisse agree to comply with OFAC regulations and censor at the Ethereum protocol level with validators. So, will the Ethereum community “Consider the censorship an attack on Ethereum and burn their stake via social consensus” or “Tolerate the censorship.”

In fact, many consider Ethereum to be more prone to censorship or forced regulatory attack by regulators after its transition to proof-of-stake (PoS). Fortunately, 62% of users believes it’s best to burn ETH stakes of providers if they choose to censor transactions. Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin also favors burning the stakes.

Moreover, many consider unstaking their ETH off centralized exchanges as these are most likely to comply with regulations. Community pushbacks against such shadowbans by regulators are critical for supporting the basic concept of “cryptocurrency.”

The Electronic Frontier Foundation tweeted the First Amendment implications in the Tornado Cash case:

“EFF is deeply concerned that the U.S. Treasury Department has included an open source computer project, Tornado Cash, on its list of sanctioned individuals. Tornado Cash is an open-source software project and website that published a decentralized cryptocurrency mixer.”

Advertisement
Advertisement

Censorship Could Break the DeFi System

DeFi protocols including Circle, Aave, Uniswap, Balancer, dYdX, Alchemy, and Infura have already started to block addresses associated with Tornado Cash and addresses sanctioned by the OFAC.

The governments and regulators’ forced enforcement against open-source technology and its developers is a potential risk to the DeFi system as well as the concept of “decentralization.”

Any DeFi assets including stablecoins, smart contracts, DAO, protocols, or company are at high risk.

Advertisement
Varinder Singh
Varinder has over 10 years of experience and is known as a seasoned leader for his involvement in the fintech sector. With over 5 years dedicated to blockchain, crypto, and Web3 developments, he has experienced two Bitcoin halving events making him key opinion leader in the space. At CoinGape Media, Varinder leads the editorial decisions, spearheading the news team to cover latest updates, markets trends and developments within the crypto industry. The company was recognized as Best Crypto Media Company 2024 for high impact and quality reporting. Being a Master of Technology degree holder, analytics thinker, technology enthusiast, Varinder has shared his knowledge of disruptive technologies in over 5000+ news, articles, and papers.
Why trust CoinGape: CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights to our readers. Our journalists and analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.
Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.