Breaking: New Class Action Lawsuit Filed Against Coinbase, Brian Armstrong
Highlights
- Coinbase users files class action lawsuit alleging the company misled them and class into buying securities.
- Lawsuit argues SOL, MATIC, NEAR, MANA, ALGO, UNI, XTZ, and XLM are securities.
- They also claimed that the Coinbase Earn accounts violated securities laws, while seeking a jury trial.
Crypto exchange firm Coinbase faces another class action lawsuit alleging the company misled investors into buying securities. The complaint is brought by individual complainants claiming Coinbase has violated securities laws. In addition, the lawsuit argues Solana (SOL), Polygon (MATIC), Near Protocol (NEAR), Decentraland (MANA), Algorand (ALGO), Uniswap (UNI), Tezos (XTZ), and Stellar Lumens (XLM) are securities.
Class Action Filed Against Coinbase and Brian Armstrong
Plaintiffs Gerardo Aceves, Thomas Fan, Edwin Martinez, Tiffany Smoot, Edouard Cordi, and Brett Maggard have brought a class action against Coinbase Global and CEO Brian Armstrong, as per a court filing.
The complainants accuse Coinbase of intentionally and repeatedly violating California and Florida securities laws. They claim Coinbase admitted it is a “Securities Broker” in its user agreement, making digital asset securities sold by the exchange as investment contracts or other securities. The plaintiff also took aim at Coinbase prime brokerage as a securities broker/dealer.
They allege digital assets listed on Coinbase are securities and cite Algorand, Decentraland, Polygon, Near Protocol, Uniswap, Solana, Stellar Lumens, and Tezos as securities. In addition, they assert Coinbase Earn accounts violated securities laws by advertising and promoting for higher yields.
Plaintiffs are seeking full recession, statutory damages under state law, and injunctive relief in a demand for jury trial. The lawsuit is similar to other class actions and the SEC lawsuit.
Also Read: Shiba Inu Exec Fumes At Elon Musk Over X’s Security Concerns
Coinbase Seeks Clarity on Investment Contract Definition
Coinbase escalated its legal dispute with the U.S. SEC by filing an interlocutory appeal on the “investment contract” definition.
Paul Grewal, CLO of Coinbase, told CoinGape that the exchange has a higher chance of victory as the SEC’s interpretation of investment contracts doesn’t align with Second Circuit and Supreme Court cases. The moves came after Coinbase gained major clarity in the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit that secondary sales of crypto are not securities as there are no investment contracts.
Coinbase’s interlocutory appeal is also critical for Ripple Vs SEC lawsuit. The SEC could appeal Judge Torres’ ruling that programmatic sales of XRP are not securities.
Also Read: Elon Musk’s Tesla Adds Dogecoin As Payment Method, DOGE Price Rally 20%
- Breaking: U.S. Supreme Court Strikes Down Trump Tariffs, BTC Price Rises
- Breaking: U.S. PCE Inflation Rises To 2.9% YoY, Bitcoin Falls
- BlackRock Signals $270M Bitcoin, Ethereum Sell-Off as $2.4B in Crypto Options Expire
- XRP News: Dubai Tokenized Properties Trading Goes Live on XRPL as Ctrl Alt Advances Project
- Aave Crosses $1B in RWAs as Capital Rotates From DeFi to Tokenized Assets
- Ethereum Price Rises After SCOTUS Ruling: Here’s Why a Drop to $1,500 is Possible
- Will Pi Network Price See a Surge After the Mainnet Launch Anniversary?
- Bitcoin and XRP Price Prediction As White House Sets March 1st Deadline to Advance Clarity Act
- Top 3 Price Predictions Feb 2026 for Solana, Bitcoin, Pi Network as Odds of Trump Attacking Iran Rise
- Cardano Price Prediction Feb 2026 as Coinbase Accepts ADA as Loan Collateral
- Ripple Prediction: Will Arizona XRP Reserve Boost Price?













