Breaking: New Class Action Lawsuit Filed Against Coinbase, Brian Armstrong
Highlights
- Coinbase users files class action lawsuit alleging the company misled them and class into buying securities.
- Lawsuit argues SOL, MATIC, NEAR, MANA, ALGO, UNI, XTZ, and XLM are securities.
- They also claimed that the Coinbase Earn accounts violated securities laws, while seeking a jury trial.
Crypto exchange firm Coinbase faces another class action lawsuit alleging the company misled investors into buying securities. The complaint is brought by individual complainants claiming Coinbase has violated securities laws. In addition, the lawsuit argues Solana (SOL), Polygon (MATIC), Near Protocol (NEAR), Decentraland (MANA), Algorand (ALGO), Uniswap (UNI), Tezos (XTZ), and Stellar Lumens (XLM) are securities.
Class Action Filed Against Coinbase and Brian Armstrong
Plaintiffs Gerardo Aceves, Thomas Fan, Edwin Martinez, Tiffany Smoot, Edouard Cordi, and Brett Maggard have brought a class action against Coinbase Global and CEO Brian Armstrong, as per a court filing.
The complainants accuse Coinbase of intentionally and repeatedly violating California and Florida securities laws. They claim Coinbase admitted it is a “Securities Broker” in its user agreement, making digital asset securities sold by the exchange as investment contracts or other securities. The plaintiff also took aim at Coinbase prime brokerage as a securities broker/dealer.
They allege digital assets listed on Coinbase are securities and cite Algorand, Decentraland, Polygon, Near Protocol, Uniswap, Solana, Stellar Lumens, and Tezos as securities. In addition, they assert Coinbase Earn accounts violated securities laws by advertising and promoting for higher yields.
Plaintiffs are seeking full recession, statutory damages under state law, and injunctive relief in a demand for jury trial. The lawsuit is similar to other class actions and the SEC lawsuit.
Also Read: Shiba Inu Exec Fumes At Elon Musk Over X’s Security Concerns
Coinbase Seeks Clarity on Investment Contract Definition
Coinbase escalated its legal dispute with the U.S. SEC by filing an interlocutory appeal on the “investment contract” definition.
Paul Grewal, CLO of Coinbase, told CoinGape that the exchange has a higher chance of victory as the SEC’s interpretation of investment contracts doesn’t align with Second Circuit and Supreme Court cases. The moves came after Coinbase gained major clarity in the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit that secondary sales of crypto are not securities as there are no investment contracts.
Coinbase’s interlocutory appeal is also critical for Ripple Vs SEC lawsuit. The SEC could appeal Judge Torres’ ruling that programmatic sales of XRP are not securities.
Also Read: Elon Musk’s Tesla Adds Dogecoin As Payment Method, DOGE Price Rally 20%
- Pi Network Dedicates 350,000 Active Nodes for AI With OpenMind Partnership
- Breaking: Trump Cuts Tariffs as US-China Reaches 1-Year Trade Deal, Bitcoin Rebounds
- Binance Responds to Charges of Supporting Trump-Family Crypto USD1 and WLFI Soon After CZ Pardon
- SpaceX Makes Third Huge Bitcoin Transfer in 10 Days, Is Elon Musk Planning Something Big?
- Crypto Market Tumbles as Jerome Powell Says December Rate Cut ‘Far From Certain’
- Ethereum Price Flips BTC in Strategy Shift, Eyes $4500 Level
- Expert Predicts XRP Price to Hit $10 as Elliot Wave, XRPR ETF Inflows Align
- HYPE Price Prediction as 21Shares Files S-1 for Hyperliquid ETF—Can Bulls Push HYPE to $60?
- Bitcoin Price Rally Bound? How the Fed’s Move May Unleash Crypto
- Can ASTER Price Rebound 50% as Whale Activity and Bullish Pattern Align?
- Pi Network Patterns Point to More Gains Despite Manipulation Claims
MEXC