NFT Artists Sued By Yuga Labs Respond To Allegations

Yuga Labs sued Ripps and his partner, alleging various trademark-related claims under the Lanham Act, among other things.
By Coingapestaff
Updated July 21, 2025
Yuga Labs

NFT artist and his business partner are being sued by Yuga Labs. They are the makers of the well-known Bored Ape Yacht Club NFTs, for allegedly forging “copycat” versions of their NFT collection.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Yuga Labs filed a case in June

In June, Yuga filed a lawsuit against Not Larva Labs founder Jeremy Cahen and artist Ryder Ripps. However, alleging that they had copied their NFT collections and undercut the value of the original Bored Ape products. The two have responded to the complaint, disputing many of the charges.

Yuga Labs claims in its court filing from Dec. 27,

“Each of these NFTs is an entry on a decentralized digital ledger and entirely unique by design, making them both non-fungible and impossible to copy,”

According to Ripps and Cahen, their version of the BAYC collection, dubbed RR/BAYC, does not violate Yuga Labs’ copyright. Additionally, they assert that they “used conceptual art to critique hateful imagery” that Yuga Labs had been using.

Earlier in December, the United States District Court for the Central District of California denied the NFT maker’s motion to dismiss.

NFT makers are also sued

On a different front, BAYC is also being sued. A class-action lawsuit was filed by the California law firm Scott + Scott against Yuga. However, nearly 40 other people and businesses on the grounds that they participated in “a vast scheme” involving secret celebrity endorsements for goods like BAYC. A representative for Yuga refuted this.

Why this case is important

In cases involving NFTs, the Labs case emphasizes how crucial it is to comprehend the technology supporting IP claims. The court was able to determine that the digital assets pointed to by Ripps’ RR/BAYC NFTs and Yuga Labs’ BAYC NFTs were identical by looking under the hood. Due to this subtlety, the court correctly concluded that Ripps’ NFTs were merely a collection of fakes and were not eligible for consideration as an artistic medium under the Rogers test.

Also Read: What is NFT Staking? Pros and Cons of NFT Staking.

Advertisement
Coingapestaff
CoinGape comprises an experienced team of native content writers and editors working round the clock to cover news globally and present news as a fact rather than an opinion. CoinGape writers and reporters contributed to this article.
Why trust CoinGape: CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights to our readers. Our journalists and analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.
Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.