OpenAI Challenges NYT to Prove Originality of Articles in Copyright Case
Highlights
- OpenAI has asked a New York court to require the New York Times (NYT) to prove the originality of its articles.
- The AI company's legal request includes access to the NYT's reporter’s notes, interview records, and other related source materials.
- OpenAI claims this information is vital to establishing the originality and authorship of the NYT articles used to train its AI models.
In a notable legal confrontation, OpenAI has requested that the New York Times (NYT) validate the originality of its articles. The AI firm demands the court mandate NYT disclose detailed source materials for each copyrighted article. This move is part of an ongoing lawsuit in which the NYT accuses OpenAI of using its content without permission.
OpenAI Requests Transparency from NYT
OpenAI’s legal team has approached a New York court with a significant demand. They insist that the NYT provide comprehensive details about the creation process of its articles. The request includes access to the reporter’s notes, interview records, and other source materials. OpenAI argues that this information is crucial to determine the originality and authorship of the articles in question.
The court filing by OpenAI aims to explore the depth and authenticity of the NYT’s journalistic process. Their lawyers argue that the NYT’s claim of substantial investment in high-quality journalism prompts a need for transparency. They believe understanding the creation process is essential for the court to make a fair judgment.
OpenAI argues that such disclosure is necessary for its defense. Detailed insight into the NYT’s authorship process will help ascertain whether the articles are original works. The NYT made this request following allegations that OpenAI unauthorizedly used its content to train AI models.
Also Read: German Lawmaker Wants Government To HODL Bitcoin (BTC), Not Sell
NYT Fights Back on Copyright Infringement
Responding swiftly, the NYT’s legal team filed a motion to dismiss OpenAI’s request on July 3. They argue that OpenAI’s demands are excessive and could set a troubling precedent for copyright law. The NYT contends that the intricacies of their journalistic practices are irrelevant to the issue of copyright infringement.
The NYT’s opposition stresses that the request undermines the basic principles of copyright law. They believe that proving the content creation process does not pertain to the alleged misuse. The NYT’s lawyers highlight that the focus should remain whether OpenAI used the copyrighted articles without authorization.
Furthermore, the NYT accuses OpenAI of attempting to divert the court’s attention from the real issue at hand. They maintain that the lawsuit should concentrate on the legality of OpenAI’s use of the NYT’s copyrighted content. The newspaper defends its rights to its intellectual property, arguing that the creation process should remain protected.
Also Read: Core Scientific Founder Claims Bitcoin’s True Value Not Yet Realized
- 99.3% of Bitcoin Supply in Profit, Analyst Warns of Short-Term Correction
- Pro-Crypto Mike Selig Emerges As CFTC Chair Frontrunner, Gains Ripple CLO’s Endorsement
- ‘Every Crypto ETF You Can Imagine’: Expert Predicts Flurry of Filings After REX-Osprey’s 21 Applications
- Robinhood Lists Strategy’s Bitcoin-Backed Stocks, Boosting Saylor’s BTC Credit Model
- Bitcoin ETFs See 2025 Record Weekly Inflows of $3.2B as BTC Eyes New ATH
- FLOKI Price Prediction as ETP Listing Drives Adoption—Is a 160% Rally Ahead?
- BNB Coin Price Hits ATH as Derivatives Activity Soars—Is $1,520 the Next Stop?
- Aster Price Eyes $3 After Channel Breakout as Open Interest Surges to $1.37B
- Will XRP Price Hit $5 if the SEC Approves ETFs This Month?
- Bitcoin Price Hits $120K Ahead of Q4 — Can Citigroup’s Forecast Hold Up?
- Pi Network Price at Risk of Another Crash as Mysterious Whale Stops Buying
Why Trust CoinGape
CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights Read more…to our readers. Our journal analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.
