OpenAI Challenges NYT to Prove Originality of Articles in Copyright Case
Highlights
- OpenAI has asked a New York court to require the New York Times (NYT) to prove the originality of its articles.
- The AI company's legal request includes access to the NYT's reporter’s notes, interview records, and other related source materials.
- OpenAI claims this information is vital to establishing the originality and authorship of the NYT articles used to train its AI models.
In a notable legal confrontation, OpenAI has requested that the New York Times (NYT) validate the originality of its articles. The AI firm demands the court mandate NYT disclose detailed source materials for each copyrighted article. This move is part of an ongoing lawsuit in which the NYT accuses OpenAI of using its content without permission.
OpenAI Requests Transparency from NYT
OpenAI’s legal team has approached a New York court with a significant demand. They insist that the NYT provide comprehensive details about the creation process of its articles. The request includes access to the reporter’s notes, interview records, and other source materials. OpenAI argues that this information is crucial to determine the originality and authorship of the articles in question.
The court filing by OpenAI aims to explore the depth and authenticity of the NYT’s journalistic process. Their lawyers argue that the NYT’s claim of substantial investment in high-quality journalism prompts a need for transparency. They believe understanding the creation process is essential for the court to make a fair judgment.
OpenAI argues that such disclosure is necessary for its defense. Detailed insight into the NYT’s authorship process will help ascertain whether the articles are original works. The NYT made this request following allegations that OpenAI unauthorizedly used its content to train AI models.
Also Read: German Lawmaker Wants Government To HODL Bitcoin (BTC), Not Sell
NYT Fights Back on Copyright Infringement
Responding swiftly, the NYT’s legal team filed a motion to dismiss OpenAI’s request on July 3. They argue that OpenAI’s demands are excessive and could set a troubling precedent for copyright law. The NYT contends that the intricacies of their journalistic practices are irrelevant to the issue of copyright infringement.
The NYT’s opposition stresses that the request undermines the basic principles of copyright law. They believe that proving the content creation process does not pertain to the alleged misuse. The NYT’s lawyers highlight that the focus should remain whether OpenAI used the copyrighted articles without authorization.
Furthermore, the NYT accuses OpenAI of attempting to divert the court’s attention from the real issue at hand. They maintain that the lawsuit should concentrate on the legality of OpenAI’s use of the NYT’s copyrighted content. The newspaper defends its rights to its intellectual property, arguing that the creation process should remain protected.
Also Read: Core Scientific Founder Claims Bitcoin’s True Value Not Yet Realized
- Michael Saylor’s Strategy Faces 2025 Q4 Loss Following Bitcoin and MSTR’s Crash
- Bitcoin Rises to $90K Even as Trump Defends Tariffs Ahead of Supreme Court Ruling
- Bitget’s 2025 Recap: Bitcoin and Gold Lead as ‘Safe Haven’ Assets as Dollar Posts Worst Yearly Loss
- BlackRock Moves Bitcoin and Ethereum, Stirring Sell-Off Fears Ahead of $2.2B Options Expiry
- Why is PEPE Coin Rising Today (Jan 2)
- Ethereum Price Prediction 2026 As Vitalik Buterin Unveils New Scaling Roadmap
- Bitcoin Price and XRP Price Prediction 2026 Ahead of US Crypto Reserve, CLARITY Act
- Analyst Predicts Cardano Price to Surge 103% to $0.75 as Midnight, Leios Launch Near
- Dogecoin Price Jumps 10% as Whales Scoop Up 220M DOGE; What’s Next?
- Here’s Why Crypto Market Turns Bullish as 2026 Kicks Off
- Pepe Coin price Enters 2026 with a 25% Surge as Open Interest Jumps 82% — What’s Next?
Claim $500





