OpenAI & Microsoft Face Another Lawsuit Amid NYT Woes Over AI Training
In a legal tussle that could reshape the landscape of AI development, OpenAI and Microsoft find themselves embroiled in lawsuits filed by nonfiction authors Nicholas Basbanes and Nicholas Gage. The authors allege that their works were improperly used to train OpenAI’s ChatGPT and other AI services, constituting copyright infringement.
Meanwhile, the legal battle comes amid a time when The New York Times already added to the pressure, suing OpenAI and Microsoft over the alleged misuse of its journalists’ work for AI training.
OpenAI & Microsoft Face Another Legal Hurdles
Two nonfiction authors, Nicholas Basbanes and Nicholas Gage, have taken legal action against OpenAI and Microsoft, accusing the companies of copyright infringement. In a proposed class action, the authors claim that their books were utilized without permission to train OpenAI’s GPT large language model, powering popular AI services such as ChatGPT.
In addition, the lawsuit adds to a growing trend, with various writers, including comedian Sarah Silverman and “Game of Thrones” author George R.R. Martin, filing similar complaints against tech companies for alleged misuse of their work in AI program training, Reuters reported.
Meanwhile, representatives for Microsoft and OpenAI are yet to respond to the lawsuit, marking a significant clash between content creators and tech giants. Notably, Michael Richter, the lawyer representing Basbanes and Gage, expressed concern over the lack of compensation for authors whose works contribute to a burgeoning billion-dollar-plus industry.
Also Read: Satoshi Nakamoto Is Back? Bitcoin Worth Over $1 Mln Moved To Satoshi’s Wallet
Hovering Challenges On The AI Giant
The legal battle intensified as The New York Times filed a landmark lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft on December 27, 2023. The media firm filed the lawsuit alleging the unauthorized use of its journalists’ work to train AI technologies, including ChatGPT.
Seeking damages in the billions, NYT challenges what it calls the “unlawful copying and use” of its content. Besides the monetary compensation, the lawsuit demands the dismantling of artificial intelligence (AI) models and training data incorporating NYT’s copyrighted material, signaling a pivotal moment in the ongoing conflict between traditional media and AI-driven platforms.
In addition, this clash underscores broader tensions between digital journalism and AI technologies, with traditional media outlets viewing AI chatbots as potential competitors diverting traffic and revenue. As the legal drama unfolds, it casts a spotlight on the delicate balance between intellectual property rights and the evolving AI landscape.
Meanwhile, amid these legal challenges, OpenAI is actively engaging in negotiations with publishers, seeking licensing deals for content pieces to enhance its AI models. Tom Rubin, Chief of Intellectual Property and Content at OpenAI, reports positive progress in ongoing discussions, emphasizing the organization’s commitment to collaborative partnerships in the evolving AI sector.
Also Read: Nebraska Proposes Pro-Bitcoin Bill To Safeguard Fundamental Rights
- U.S. SEC Ends Zcash Foundation Probe as Dubai Tightens Rules on Privacy Tokens
- Sui Network Suffers Outage as Mainnet Stalls; SUI Price Flat
- Crypto ETF News: Bitwise Launches Chainlink ETF as Institutional Inflows Return
- Breaking: Supreme Court Delays Ruling on Trump Tariffs; May Decide January 16
- Senators Make Amendments To CLARITY Act On Yield and DeFi Ahead Of Crypto Bill’s Markup
- Bitcoin Price Forecast: How the Supreme Court Tariff Decision Could Affect BTC Price
- Ethereum Price Prediction as Network Activity Hits ATH Ahead of CLARITY Markup
- Robinhood Stock Price Prediction: What’s Potential for HOOD in 2026??
- Cardano Price Prediction as Germany’s DZ Bank Gets MiCAR Approval for Cardano Trading
- Meme Coins Price Prediction: What’s Next for Pepe Coin, Dogecoin, and Shiba Inu Amid Market Rally?
- Standard Chartered Predicts Ethereum Price could reach $40,000 by 2030





