OpenSea’s Transaction Volumes on Sharp Decline, Is NFT Popularity on A Decline?

Published by
OpenSea’s Transaction Volumes on Sharp Decline, Is NFT Popularity on A Decline?

OpenSea, the Ethereum-based largest NFT marketplace is seeing a sharp decline in the daily transaction volumes on the platform. On Wednesday, September 8, the daily transaction volume on OpenSea was less than $100 million for the first time since August 21.

Also, comparing it to the peak of August 29, the daily transaction volumes have dropped by a staggering 75% in just 10 days.

Courtesy: OpenSea

Is the NFT Popularity on A Decline?

The last month of august was phenomenal for the overall NFT market. the monthly trading volumes on OpenSea shot up to a staggering $3 billion. Furthermore, crypto-journalist Colin Wu reports that some of the top trading NFTs like Loot, CryptoPunks, and Bored Ape have dropped by nearly 100% in the last 24 hours suggesting strong declining trends. Wu reports:

“NFT popularity is decreasing. OpenSea shows that in the past 24h, Loot transaction volume -45.69%, CryptoPunks -90.81%, Bored Ape -14.58%. The floor price of CryptoPunks has fallen to 86.5 ETH, which was higher than 140 ETH before”.

These are still the early trends and we have yet to see how the market moves going ahead.

OpenSea Bugs Destroys NFTs Worth $100K

A recent bug encountered on OpenSea has accidentally destroyed approximately 42 NFT worth $100,000. Nick Johnson, the lead developer of Ethereum Name Service (ENS) was the first to raise this issue.

He noted that when he transferred an ENS name, in form of an NFT, it went to a burn address. Thus, the ENS NFT went to an address that no one can control and nobody can further move it.

The ENS service allows users to link blockchain addresses with domain names. This makes it easy to send transactions to readable names instead of complex blockchain addresses. Johnson said that he first registered the ENS name rilxxlir.eth. Even though he registered and renewed it with personal funds, it was held by another ENS account for some weird reasons. He added:

“A frantic call to @OpenSea later, it transpires I was the first and apparently only victim of a bug introduced to their transfer page in the past 24 hours, which affected all ERC721 transfers to ENS names. Ownership of rilxxlir.eth is now permanently burned”.

But in an updated message Jhonson added that OpenSea has fixed the bug. Apparently, no one else was impacted by the bug.

Advertisement
Share
Bhushan Akolkar

Bhushan is a seasoned crypto writer with over eight years of experience spanning more than 10,000 contributions across multiple platforms like CoinGape, CoinSpeaker, Bitcoinist, Crypto News Flash, and others. Being a Fintech enthusiast, he loves reporting across Crypto, Blockchain, DeFi, Global Macros with a keen understanding in financial markets. 

He is committed to continuous learning and stays motivated by sharing the knowledge he acquires. In his free time, Bhushan enjoys reading thriller fiction novels and occasionally explores his culinary skills. Bhushan has a bachelors degree in electronics engineering, however, his interest in finance and economics drives him to crypto and blockchain.

Published by
Why trust CoinGape: CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights to our readers. Our journalists and analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.
Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.

Recent Posts

  • Crypto News

December Fed Rate Cut Prospects Strengthen After ADP Shows Deepening Labor Market Weakness

December Fed rate cut prospects strengthened after ADP reported a deeper than expected drop in…

December 3, 2025
  • Crypto News

Trump-Backed World Liberty Financial to Roll Out RWA Products in January

Trump-backed World Liberty Financial has revealed plans to expand its crypto offerings by January next…

December 3, 2025
  • Crypto News

Crypto Exchange Bitget Teams Up With Julián Álvarez to Spotlight GetAgent’s Trading Capabilities

Bitget crypto exchange has partnered with LALIGA star player Julian Alvarez to highlight the trading…

December 3, 2025
  • Crypto News

MSCI Index Removal Threat Grows as Strategy Enters Negotiation Talks, Saylor Confirms

Strategy has officially started off talks with top index firm MSCI. Michael Saylor has confirmed…

December 3, 2025
  • Crypto News

FOMC Meeting December 2025: Schedule, Key Expectations and Interest Rate Outlook

Crypto market participants await next week’s FOMC Meeting, one of the most crucial events to…

December 3, 2025
  • Crypto News

UK Follows U.S. Lead in Adoption, Grants Crypto Full Legal Property Status

The United Kingdom has given formal recognition to digital assets as property under its national…

December 3, 2025