President Biden, SEC Face Backlash From Coinbase, Ripple, Crypto Industry
Highlights
- Biden's veto of SAB 121 sparks bipartisan backlash over crypto regulation and custody rules.
- Coinbase and Ripple criticize SEC's SAB 121, claiming it stifles crypto industry growth.
- Congress urges Biden to reconsider SAB 121 veto, citing bipartisan support for crypto innovation.
President Joe Biden recently vetoed a House Joint Resolution to repeal the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) Staff Accounting Bulletin 121 (SAB 121). This bulletin mandates financial institutions holding cryptocurrencies so that customers can list these assets on their balance sheets.
Critics argue that this requirement complicates the ability of financial institutions to collaborate with crypto companies. Biden’s statement emphasized that the veto was necessary for consumer and investor protection.
Concerns Over President Biden’s SAB 121 Veto
Prominent figures in the cryptocurrency industry have expressed their discontent with the President’s decision. Faryar Shirzad, Chief Policy Officer at Coinbase, criticized the veto, stating,
“The President was not served well by his team. He is using his extraordinary veto power to protect a sneaky bureaucratic move by the SEC Chair to hide behind his staff to destabilize an entire industry.”
Shirzad argued that defending the views of an agency’s staff, which were not formally considered by the Commission, against bipartisan majorities in Congress is a disservice to President Biden and the Office of the President.
Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse also commented on the situation in an interview with CNBC. He highlighted the increasing institutional involvement in the crypto industry and noted that the election of leaders who support crypto innovation and consumer protection is a positive development. However, he expressed concerns about the broader implications of the SEC’s guidance on the industry.
Crypto Community Response
The veto has also drawn strong reactions from Congress. Senator Cynthia Lummis and Representative Patrick McHenry, critical proponents of the resolution, have voiced their opposition. McHenry stated,
“The President’s veto weakens consumer protections in digital asset markets and upends decades of custody rules. By rejecting the bipartisan consensus of Congress, the Administration is doubling down on its failed approach. Senate action on #FIT21 is more urgent than ever.”
Both houses of Congress had passed the resolution with bipartisan support, reflecting widespread concern about the SEC’s approach to regulating digital assets. Lawmakers have urged the administration to reconsider the veto or work with the SEC to rescind the guidance.
The banking sector has also expressed reservations about the guidance. In a letter to President Biden, banking organizations noted that the Government Accounting Office’s assessment of SAB 121 blocks regulated banking groups from offering custody services. This sentiment was echoed by lawmakers, who stressed the need for a regulatory framework supporting innovation and consumer protection.
Read Also: El Salvador President Nayib Bukele Begins Second Term to Lead Bitcoin Adoption
- Crypto Market Braces for Volatility as BTC, ETH Options Expiry Collides $7.1 Trillion ‘Triple Witching’
- Terraform Labs Lawsuit: Jump Trading Faces $4B Case over Market Manipulation
- Coinbase Challenges US States Over Regulatory Restrictions on Prediction Markets
- Will Bitcoin Price Repeat 20-30% Crashes as BOJ Hikes Rates to 30-Year High?
- Breaking: U.S. Senate Delays CLARITY Act again, Crypto Market Structure Vote Slips to Early 2026
- Pi Coin Price Prediction as Expert Warns Bitcoin May Hit $70k After BoJ Rate Hike
- Cardano Price Outlook: Will the NIGHT Token Demand Surge Trigger a Rebound?
- Will Bitcoin Price Crash to $74K as Japan Eyes Rate Hike on December 19?
- Bitwise Predicts Solana Price Will Hit New All-Time Highs in 2026
- Bitcoin Price Outlook: Capriole Founder Warns of a Drop Below $50K by 2028
- XRP Price Rare Pattern Points to a Surge to $3 as ETFs Cross $1B Milestone





