Pro-XRP Lawyer Lauds Kraken’s Ripple Citation In SEC Lawsuit

Pro-XRP lawyer lauds Kraken's Ripple citation in SEC lawsuit, highlighting the broader implications of the legal battle.
By Rupam Roy
Updated August 11, 2025
Do Kwon, Terra Reach Settlement With SEC; LUNA Price Jumps 20%

Highlights

  • Kraken filed to dismiss the SEC's case alleging unregistered securities exchange, broker, dealer, and clearing agency operations.
  • Pro-XRP lawyer praises Kraken's Ripple citation in SEC lawsuit, revealing significant legal insights.
  • Kraken challenges SEC's lack of issuer-buyer connection, echoing Judge Torres' Ripple ruling.

Pro-XRP lawyer Bill Morgan’s recent social media post has sparked curiosity in the crypto market amid Kraken’s legal battle with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Notably, the leading crypto exchange Kraken, has ignited a legal battle with the SEC by filing a motion to dismiss allegations of operating as an unregistered securities exchange.

Meanwhile, the move comes amid a contentious climate in the crypto sphere, with implications extending beyond Kraken’s case. However, the comments from Bill Morgan sheds light on the broader implications of Kraken’s defense strategy.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Pro-XRP Lawyer’s Analysis On Kraken Vs. SEC Lawsuit

Pro-XRP lawyer Bill Morgan applauds Kraken’s citation of Ripple in its latest filing with the Northern California court to dismiss the SEC’s case. Meanwhile, the lawyer offered insights into the ongoing Kraken vs. SEC lawsuit, highlighting Kraken’s stance on securities.

In its filing, the crypto exchange argues that the SEC fails to establish a relationship between token issuers like ALGO, ADA, and MATIC and Kraken’s customers. In addition, the exchange’s blind bid/ask trading mirrors Ripple’s programmatic sales, deemed non-investment contracts by Judge Torres.

Meanwhile, the SEC’s case against Ripple, alleging a lack of issuer-buyer connection, faces challenges if Judge Torres’ summary judgment holds. This poses a significant hurdle to SEC’s settlement efforts in the Ripple case, signaling potential complexities ahead in the legal battle.

Notably, Kraken’s assertion that its primary exchange operates on a blind bid/ask basis mirrors the findings in the Ripple case, where Judge Torres ruled that Ripple’s programmatic sales didn’t constitute investment contracts. By extending this argument to other tokens listed on their platform, Kraken challenges the SEC’s expansive interpretation of securities laws, potentially setting a precedent with far-reaching consequences.

Also Read: Farcaster Enables Seamless Solana Address Verification on Decentralized Protocol

Advertisement
Advertisement

Counterpunch In The Legal Battle

In its filing, Kraken underscored the parallels with the Ripple case, emphasizing the lack of an issuer-buyer connection as a central defense strategy. By dissecting the SEC’s allegations against Ripple, the crypto exchange aims to debunk the notion of a reasonable expectation of profits tied to issuer efforts. Notably, the intricacies highlighted by Kraken echo concerns raised by Morgan regarding the SEC’s alleged misuse of enforcement proceedings.

Meanwhile, the crypto exchange’s decision to confront the SEC head-on is not without context. Kraken argues that the timing of the SEC’s charges against them, coinciding with their advocacy for limited SEC jurisdiction over digital assets, raises eyebrows.

Moreover, the SEC’s strategic maneuvering, filing charges in multiple jurisdictions amid pending dismissal motions, underscores the high stakes involved in this legal showdown.

However, amid regulatory uncertainties and a shifting legal landscape, Kraken’s bold stance reverberates across the cryptocurrency industry. As the battle lines are drawn, the outcome of this clash between regulatory oversight and crypto innovation will shape the future of digital asset markets.

Also Read: Bitcoin Miner Riot, Texas Blockchain Council Files Lawsuit Against US DOE, EIA, OMB

Advertisement
Rupam Roy
Rupam is a seasoned professional with three years of experience in the financial market, where he has developed a reputation as a meticulous research analyst and insightful journalist. He thrives on exploring the dynamic nuances of the financial landscape. Currently serving as a sub-editor at Coingape, Rupam's expertise extends beyond conventional boundaries. His role involves breaking stories, analyzing AI-related developments, providing real-time updates on the crypto market, and presenting insightful economic news. Rupam's career is characterized by a deep passion for unraveling the complexities of finance and delivering impactful stories that resonate with a diverse audience.
Why trust CoinGape: CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights to our readers. Our journalists and analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.
Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.