Crypto tokens are often grouped into lists like “best,” “top,” or “most promising.” On the surface, these lists can look similar, but the tokens inside them can behave very differently once people actually start using or trading them.
Our approach is simple. We don’t try to predict prices or tell readers which token will perform best. Instead, we try to explain what a token is, why it exists, and what risks come with it.
Different tokens are built for different purposes. Some are meant to power networks, some exist mainly for speculation, and others are tied to specific platforms or narratives. Because of that, we don’t treat all tokens the same or apply one rigid scoring formula across every list.
The goal of our token lists is to help readers understand trade-offs. What looks attractive at first glance may come with hidden risks later. This methodology explains how we look at crypto tokens when building and ranking our lists.