Rep. Wiley Nickel Urges SEC to Withdraw SAB 121

Maxwell Mutuma
May 15, 2024 Updated May 31, 2025
Why Trust CoinGape
CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights to our readers. Our journal analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.
House Gears Up for Crucial Vote on Biden's Veto of SAB 121 Crypto Rule

Highlights

  • Congressman Wiley Nickel urges SEC Chairman Gary Gensler to withdraw SAB 121, citing its stringent guidelines on digital asset accounting.
  • Bipartisan Senate support for nullifying SAB 121 reflects significant opposition to the SEC’s current stance on digital assets.
  • Nickel argues that the digital assets industry views the SEC’s policies as hostile and that they could harm broader economic interests.

Congressman Wiley Nickel has called on SEC Chairman Gary Gensler to withdraw Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) 121. This request comes as a bipartisan Senate vote on nullification looms, highlighting burgeoning concerns orbiting the SEC’s approach to digital assets.

SAB 121 is an interpretive guidance document revealed by the  U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission that came into effect as of 2022. It mandates listed firms, including banks, to record crypto assets as both an asset and liability on their balance sheets

Advertisement
Advertisement

Rep. Wiley Nickel Calls for SAB 121 Reversal

Nickel’s request to withdraw SAB 121 marks a crucial point in the regulatory landscape. The bulletin has drawn criticism for its stringent guidelines on the accounting of digital assets. Bipartisan support for nullification in the Senate indicates substantial opposition to these guidelines, which many view as hindering innovation and growth within the digital assets sector.

Nickel’s critique focuses on the broader economic implications of the SEC’s policies. He believes the current regulatory environment is perceived as hostile by the digital assets industry, potentially undermining broader economic interests. Nickel stated that the SEC’s stance is not aligned with President Biden’s best interests, emphasizing the need for regulatory bodies to foster, rather than stifle, emerging technologies.

Tom Emmer, the House of Representatives majority whip, has also criticized Gary Gensler’s approach. Emmer argues that Gensler’s methodology conflicts with the SEC’s primary mission to protect investors, promote capital formation, and sustain fair, orderly, and efficient markets. Emmer expressed concerns that SAB 121 could lead to regulatory overreach.

Emmer emphasized that the SEC appears to be deviating from its statutory duties. He warned that the regulation restricting banks from effectively holding crypto assets might undermine market efficiency and investor confidence. This reflects a broader Republican concern about the potential negative impact of regulatory expansion on capital markets.

Advertisement
Advertisement

SAB 121 Faces Backlash from Crypto Sector

The crypto industry has also voiced opposition to SAB 121. Cardano (ADA) founder Charles Hoskinson criticized the Biden administration for what he sees as an attempt to “kill” the crypto industry. He called on industry stakeholders to stand up for their rights against what he perceives as unjust regulatory measures.

Hoskinson’s comments highlight a growing sentiment within the crypto community that the SEC’s actions are overly restrictive. Industry enthusiasts argue that such regulations could stifle innovation and hinder the growth of digital assets. The backlash against SAB 121 suggests that many within the industry believe that a more balanced approach is needed to support both regulation and innovation.

Also Read: Turn $1,000 Into $100,000 Buying 6 XRP Rivals As Ripple vs SEC Battle Escalates

Advertisement
coingape google news coingape google news
Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.

Why Trust CoinGape

CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights Read more…to our readers. Our journal analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.

About Author
About Author
Maxwell is a crypto-economic analyst and Blockchain enthusiast, passionate about helping people understand the potential of decentralized technology. I write extensively on topics such as blockchain, cryptocurrency, tokens, and more for many publications. My goal is to spread knowledge about this revolutionary technology and its implications for economic freedom and social good.
Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.