Ripple CEO Files a Motion to Dismiss SEC’s Amended Complaint Against Him

By Prashant Jha
Garlinghouse no fan of the SEC

Brad Garlinghouse, the CEO of Ripple has filed a motion to dismiss the Security and Exchange Commission’s amended complaint against him calling it a regulatory reach. The SEC filed a class-action lawsuit against Ripple and two of its executives back in December 2020, accusing the decedents of selling unregistered security in the form of XRP and manipulating the market via media using social media to increase XRP’s price.

The letter says,

what is fatal to the SEC’s aiding and abetting claim is the lack of any plausible allegations that Mr. Garlinghouse’s state of mind ever crossed over from general awareness of the risk inherent in the digital currency space that a digital asset could be classified as security if certain criteria were met, to knowledge or recklessness that Defendants’ transactions in XRP specifically were or are investment contracts or that Ripple was somehow doing something wrong. Without this, the SEC’s aiding and abetting claim must be dismissed.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Would Ripple Come Out Victorious Against SEC?

The first virtual court hearing for the case started in February, however just before the first court date, SEC made some key changes in its court filing where it excluded market manipulation claims. Later during the court proceedings, Ripple’s legal counsel revealed that major cryptocurrency exchanges in the US approached SEC in 2019 enquiring about the status of XRP and whether they can offer and sell XRP from their platform. Reportedly, SEC ignored these queries and didn’t sound any warning against offering XRP from their platforms.

SEC’s lawsuit against Ripple was seen as the end of the road for Ripple in the US by many, as it was the first time when the regulatory body was going after the executives of a crypto company for the unregistered sale of a security. Prior to the Ripple lawsuit, SEC had also charged Telegram and Kik for a similar offense, but their respective executives were not involved. However, after the first court hearing and SEC’s amendments to their complaint, it seems Ripple has an upperhand in the case.

Advertisement
Prashant Jha
An engineering graduate, Prashant focuses on UK and Indian markets. As a crypto-journalist, his interests lie in blockchain technology adoption across emerging economies.
Why trust CoinGape: CoinGape has covered the cryptocurrency industry since 2017, aiming to provide informative insights to our readers. Our journalists and analysts bring years of experience in market analysis and blockchain technology to ensure factual accuracy and balanced reporting. By following our Editorial Policy, our writers verify every source, fact-check each story, rely on reputable sources, and attribute quotes and media correctly. We also follow a rigorous Review Methodology when evaluating exchanges and tools. From emerging blockchain projects and coin launches to industry events and technical developments, we cover all facets of the digital asset space with unwavering commitment to timely, relevant information.
Investment disclaimer: The content reflects the author’s personal views and current market conditions. Please conduct your own research before investing in cryptocurrencies, as neither the author nor the publication is responsible for any financial losses.
Ad Disclosure: This site may feature sponsored content and affiliate links. All advertisements are clearly labeled, and ad partners have no influence over our editorial content.